MBRRACE-UK: Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care
MBRRACE-UK: Perinatal Mortality Surveillance report for births in 2016
We thank the teams from NPEU for compiling these reports. This vital information should provide health professionals the impetus to improve care for women and babies. It is not acceptable that there are hospitals who do not respond – the time has come for them to be shamed into doing so. If they do not feel it is important enough to send in their statistics, is that because they have something to hide or more worrying, is it that they simply don’t care. These hospitals are also the ones unlikely to react to the reports’ recommendations.
We note, with concern, that these reports are no longer being sent to stakeholders ahead of their official release. We agree with Professor Jenny Kurinczuk about the ramifications of this decision. From AIMS’ point of view, we are a charity run by volunteers and the more notice we have, the easier it is to respond promptly.
To the reports:
AIMS is not surprised at the findings of the first report Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care.
72% of women who died did not receive good care and
88% of women surviving major obstetric haemorrhage did not receive good care.
We know from the women who come to our helpline and those whom we work with that there is poor care throughout the maternity service, particularly
For the Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report
We note the little change in statistics but worry about the findings of the next report. We know that many women are being forced into induction of labour in an attempt to reduce the number of babies who are stillborn, despite the lack of evidence of its effectiveness. This one solution may (or may not) solve one crisis but creates another, with the high possibility of physical injury and traumatic birth which can have devastating lifelong consequences for many women.
The increase in the induction rate is putting further stress on an already over-stretched maternity service, which is likely to lead to more sub-standard care in other areas. It also means that fewer women will be eligible to access out-of-hospital birth places, where we know the risks to mothers are lower.
We note the small numbers of parents consenting to post mortems and would like to see health professionals spending more time with bereaved parents explaining the benefits of post mortems, which we acknowledge are essential for a better understanding of why babies die.
One thing we do know is that the outcomes for babies are significantly better when their mother is cared for in a Continuity of Carer model, including reductions in stillbirths as well as potentially damaging birth interventions. AIMS continues to campaign for Continuity of Carer as an evidence based way to improve outcomes without the downsides of medical interventions. AIMS is a stakeholder in the Better Births Implementation programme and will continue to campaign for full implementation – as we firmly believe then life for women, their pregnancies and their babies will indeed be better.
We have responded quickly to the release of these reports, but will take more time to read and digest the content in more detail. We will make more comment in a subsequent AIMS Journal.
Thank you again to the teams who compile these important reports.
AIMS Trustees and Volunteers
9th November 2018
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.
AIMS does not give medical advice, but instead we focus on helping women to find the information that they need to make informed decisions about what is right for them, and support them to have their decisions respected by their health care providers. The AIMS Helpline volunteers will be happy to provide further information and support. Please email firstname.lastname@example.org or ring 0300 365 0663.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 Lorna Tinsley Interview by Rachel Boldero AIMS believes that an effective Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is crucial for a well-funct…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 By Wendy Jones PhD MRPharmS MBE ‘ Scientific, evidence-led information which is very up to date and relevant, and … better informed than…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 The OBS facilitators: Charlotte Gilman, Julie Gallegos, Lisa Mansour and Jayne Joyce (left to right) By Jayne Joyce IBCLC Project Lead Ox…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
This year’s AGM will be an online meeting, so we plan to keep it to two hours. However, there will be the opportunity to stay, chat and socialise with friends and colleag…Read more
AIMS has written this week to Jeremy Hunt MP, in his role as chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, as a response to the current discussion regarding a so-…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft NICE Shared decision making Guideline. You can read our comments here The details of the consultation on the draft guidelines can…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft update of the NICE Neonatal Infection Guideline. You can read our comments here . The details of the draft guidelines can be foun…Read more