Sent 9th May 2019
By email (email@example.com)
I write in response to the opinion piece by Barbara Ellen entitled “Meghan Markle’s home birth should not blind us to the risks for most women”, published online on the 13th April1. Not only was the piece desperately trying to jump on the 'Meghan Pregnancy Band-wagon' whilst pretending to maintain an aloof irony, but it repeated incorrect and dangerous myths about homebirth which undermine the safety of women and their babies. It therefore breaches the Guardian News & Media’s Editorial Code in the area of section 1, accuracy.
Rather than using evidence, research and an assumption that women are able to make responsible and careful decisions to best suit them and their family circumstances the author is perpetuating out of date myths to the disservice of pregnant women making informed decisions about best place of birth for them and their baby.
Specific areas of inaccuracy are:
1) The article states, “Meghan Markle’s home birth should not blind us to the risks for most women”. This implies that homebirth would be an unsafe option for most women which is not evidence based. In fact, evidence from the Birthplace Study 20112 tells us that many more women could safely choose to birth at home than currently do.
2) “Ordinary women are allocated one midwife” In fact, all UK hospital trusts allocate two midwives for a homebirth, and almost all are attended by two midwives.
Both the NHS3,4 and NICE5 support homebirth in the UK as a safe and sensible option for birth, and the safest option for healthy and second or subsequent pregnancies. Undermining these facts puts women and babies at risk of unnecessary harm. Your contributor would be advised at least to read these basic sources before showing off her own ignorance on this very important subject.
1) “Meghan Markle’s home birth should not blind us to the risks for most women” https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/13/meghan-markle-home-birth-should-not-blind-us-to-risks-for-most-women
2) Birthplace Study: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/birthplace
3) NHS – “Where to give birth: The options”: www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/where-can-i-give-birth/#home-birth
4) Your Choice, Where to have your baby. Information for healthy, low risk women having their first baby:
5) NICE – “Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies”: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/chapter/Recommendations
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Jo Dagustun Mothership By Francesca Segal Chatto and Windus, 2019 288 pages £14.99 ISBN 978-1-78474-269-0 Find this…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Emma Mason Eleven Hours By Pamela Erens Published by Tin House Books 2016 ISBN 978-1941040294 176 pages Publisher's…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Clara Hubbard, age 12 The Breast Book: A puberty guide with a difference - it's the when, why and how of breasts By…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
The theme of IMUK's 2020 National Conference 2020 is The Science Behind The Art of Midwifery. Speakers to be announced and tickets will be released soon. Information is a…Read more
The Northern Maternity & Midwifery Festival will be returning on Thursday 9th July 2020. There is a call for papers and award nominations are being accepted. For more inf…Read more
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recently launched a public consultation on two draft documents they have produced. Both documents were in the…Read more
AIMS has responded to the Hull Daily Mail's article entitled, " https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/health/baby-born-bus-stop-shoelace-3571474 ". 26 November 2019 Dear E…Read more
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) plays a key role in the ongoing quality assurance and regulation of the maternity services and its staff. Effective and efficient…Read more