NICE Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies (update) 2023 - AIMS Comments

AIMS submitted comments on the draft NICE Guideline update on Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies in May 2023. You can read our comments here

The updated guidelines were published on the 29th September 2023 and can be found here

AIMS submitted 32 stakeholder comments and we are pleased to see that the majority of our suggestions were accepted in whole or in part by the Guideline Development Group. You can read our comments and those of other stakeholders, and the responses to them here.

We are particularly pleased to see the strengthening of the language around autonomy, including the recommendation:

“All staff and organisations should ensure that all birth settings have a culture of respect for each woman as an individual undergoing a significant and emotionally intense life experience, so that the woman is in control, is listened to, her choices are supported, and she is cared for with compassion.”

We are also pleased to see that the comment in the previous version that a BMI at booking of 30 to 35 kg/m2 was a factor “indicating individual assessment when planning place of birth” has been reworded to put the emphasis on the woman’s decision-making:

“Advise women that, in general, the higher their body mass index (BMI) at booking (and particularly with a BMI above 35 kg/m2), the greater the likelihood of complications, so this may be something they wish to think about when planning their place of birth.”

In response to our suggestion they have added the clarification that “in general the risks of complications are higher for nulliparous women with an increased BMI compared with multiparous women with an increased BMI.” They also “amended the summary tables in the guideline to include evidence for multiparous and nulliparous women planning birth in an alongside midwifery unit to demonstrate that the risks are increased for nulliparous women but not for multiparous women, as you suggest.” However, we are disappointed that they failed to include the main point of our comment - that evidence (and, indeed, the figures in Appendix B of the guideline) suggests that the chances of a poor outcome for multiparous women with a BMI over 35 kg/m2 appear to be lower than for nulliparous women with a BMI in what is considered the ‘healthy’ rage of 18.5 to 24.9 35 kg/m2.

We plan to publish an article summarising the updates and our comments on these in the December issue of the AIMS Journal.

All NHS Trusts/Boards should be reviewing their own local guidelines in the light of these updates. If you are an MNVP/MSLC user representative please ask them when and how they plan to do this, if not, then ask a local representative to check for you.


We hope that this page is of interest, especially to our colleagues in the maternity services improvement community.

The AIMS Campaigns Team relies on Volunteers to carry out its work. If you would like to collaborate with us, are looking for further information about our work, or would like to join our team, please email campaigns@aims.org.uk.

You are welcome to quote from or link to this article in your own work to improve maternity services but please credit AIMS as the source. If you are using a quote please include the following words: “Quote from the AIMS article {URL}. AIMS is a charity that works towards better births for all by campaigning and information sharing, protecting human rights in childbirth and helping maternity service users to know their rights, whatever birth they want, and wherever they want it. See www.aims.org.uk

Please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Sovereignty of the Body: Birth, Int…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Tamara Blakemore The First Breath I’m a birth artist, and apparently I’m here to talk about the sovereignty of the body, which feels s…

Read more

Scottish Maternity Update: Review o…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Camille Del Pozo and Anne Glover on behalf of the AIMS Campaigns Team Background AIMS wrote to Neil Gray, the Cabinet Secretary for He…

Read more

The sovereignty of the body in preg…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Alex Smith Welcome to the June 2026 edition of the AIMS journal. This issue is about the sovereignty of the body in pregnancy and chil…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: Focusing on Rights i…

Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops, " Focusing on Rights in Pregnancy and Birth ". Emma Ashworth (principal author of "The AIMS Guide to Y…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Focusing on Inductio…

Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops, " Focusing on Induction of Labour ". Nadia Higson (principal author of "The AIMS Guide to Induction of…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Understanding Twin T…

Stephanie Ernst, founder of the TAPS Support Foundation, will be explaining the issues that can arise in different types of twin pregnancies, and what twins parents need…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

The final Amos Report one month on:…

In this piece, a month following the publication of the ‘Amos Report’, the AIMS Campaigns Team sets out some high-level perspectives on the report. The team is now busy a…

Read more

Letter welcoming Rt Hon Yvette Coop…

AIMS has written to welcome the Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP on her appointment as Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. Our letter offers our thoughts on key conside…

Read more

AIMS responds to the Nursing and Mi…

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (the NMC) has been consulting on proposed changes to its education standards, including “whether education standards for midwives could…

Read more