By Nadine Edwards
Lindquist A, Kurinczuk JJ, Redshaw, Knight M (2014) Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio-economic groups: findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey. BJOG 2014. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471- 0528.13059/full
This study looked at 'health care-seeking behaviour and experiences of 5332 women three months after they had given birth'. It focused on the differences between their behaviour and experiences by socio-economic groups to try and better understand 'why socially disadvantaged women have poorer maternal health outcomes in the UK'.
The results show that the poorer you are, the more likely you are to have missed out on care during pregnancy and after birth, and to report poor communication with, and disrespectful treatment from, health practitioners - and that this contributes to poorer outcomes.
Like the authors of the Saving Mothers' Lives, and other studies and reports, the researchers recommend woman-centred care, accessible information and services, a change in culture and attitudes of health practitioners, greater continuity, better education and a shift of resources towards poorer women.
Similar recommendations have been made again and again.
Improving outcomes for women suffering disadvantages has apparently posed a puzzle for many years and services have attempted to redress the impact of inequalities. None to my knowledge have been as successful as the Albany Midwifery practice in south London. The women cared for by the Albany midwives were some of the poorest in England and are the very women behind the numbers in Andrea Lindquist et al's study who experienced poorer outcomes, and yet Albany mothers enjoyed some of the best outcomes in England, for over a decade.
|Measuring success - Albany Practice Outcomes 1997 - 2007|
|Spontaneous Vaginal birth||80.4%||(UK 62.9%)|
|Caesarean Section||16.4%||(UK 25%)|
|Exclusive breastfeeding at 28 days||74%||(UK 21% at 6 weeks)|
|Perinatal mortality||4.9/1000||(Southwark 11.8/1000 average in 2005-7)|
|Homebirth rate||45.1%||(England 2.67% in 2007)|
|Statistics with thanks to Becky Reed|
But more than this, reports from the women show that they felt well informed, listened to, respected and empowered. They were able to exert the agency which is shown to be lacking in so many surveys and studies. For example, a young, teenage woman who had not previously engaged with the services was supported by the Albany midwives through her subsequent six births and another young woman was supported to make decisions and birth safely and well, despite both women having social and/or obstetric complexities.1,2
Social models of midwifery, especially caseloading midwifery works. How much research do we need before this is implemented so that the poorer outcomes for poorer women are improved? Of course midwifery cannot reduce the very real and growing inequalities, but they can make a significant difference to outcomes at birth, the women's experience and breastfeeding.
To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 2 By Nadia Higson The Care Quality Commission (CQC) mater…Read more
To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 2 By the AIMS Campaigns Team Trust Boards will now have a…Read more
To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 2 We reviewed the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) 2019 su…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
Chair: Professor Soo Downe, University of Central Lancashire Dr Gloria Esegbona, OBGYN and Winston Churchill Fellow 2015 Kings College Learning Institute Dr Gloria Esegbo…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee On April 22, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee opened an inquiry into the plannin…Read more
AIMS welcomes the recent publication of the RCM Clinical Briefing Sheet: ‘freebirth’ or ‘unassisted childbirth’ during the COVID-19 pandemic ( www.rcm.org.uk/media/3904/f…Read more
AIMS has had many enquiries about how to find out about, and seek to influence, local service changes during this period. Here we have included several examples of issues…Read more