AIMS Commentary on the Ockenden Interim Report, published on 10 December 2020

ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)

AIMS Journal, 2021, Vol 33, No 1

To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here

Anna Madeley portrait photo

By Anna Madeley

AIMS welcomes the publication of the interim Ockenden Report1 relating to 250 cases involving the care of mothers and their babies that have so far been assessed by the ongoing independent investigation of maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (SaTH). Like the review team, AIMS is concerned that many of the issues raised are reflective of previous reports on poor maternity care in NHS trusts across the UK.

The review, which was set up at the request of Jeremy Hunt, then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is being conducted by a multidisciplinary clinical team of independent external reviewers, chaired by Donna Ockenden.

It is anticipated the final report will be published in the second quarter of 2021. However, as more families have contacted the authors (1,862 cases are in review in total), an interim report has been necessary to share the ‘immediate and essential actions’ for urgent implementation at the Trust and for reflection and, as the authors emphasise, for consideration across all NHS trusts in the UK. AIMS welcomes the decision to present these interim findings and recommendations.

The report is a sobering read, detailing – alongside recurrent themes – vignettes illustrating the organisational and systematic failures that have occurred. Good leadership and multidisciplinary team working across midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and neonatologists is a fundamental tenet of quality maternity care. Sadly, many of the vignettes and recommendations underline a failure to bring these disciplines together cohesively, particularly in relation to the escalation of concerns and the provision of compassionate care.

The report addresses the extent of Care Quality Commission (CQC) and local Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) oversight of the Trust, where concerns have previously been raised; the review team is continuing to scrutinise these results and will present its findings in the final report. Additionally, the problems surrounding senior Trust leadership instability over the preceding 20 years, and the resultant view of many historical problems as ‘legacy’ issues, highlight the fundamental necessity to address safe and effective service provision, whilst learning from incidents through robust and thorough investigations. Sadly, the report highlights how the lack of such processes may have contributed to the failure to develop continuous service improvement.

Of particular concern to AIMS are those issues which are reflective of previous reports into poor maternity care in NHS trusts across the UK. Themes include a failure to complete initial and ongoing risk assessment of women and their babies, a lack of escalation of concerns by midwives and junior obstetricians where there is a deviation from the normal course of pregnancy, labour and recovery in the early weeks after birth, injudicious use of oxytocin in the management of labour, the drive to reduce caesarean rates at any cost, and inadequate bereavement care. In other words, there were failures in offering ‘too much too soon’ as well as ‘too little too late’2.

The authors present seven Immediate and Essential Actions which they recommend that all maternity services across the UK consider and implement. These are:

  • Enhancing safety
  • Listening to women and their families
  • Staff training and working together
  • Managing complex pregnancy
  • Risk assessment throughout pregnancy
  • Monitoring foetal wellbeing
  • Informed consent

There is more detail about the recommendations for each of these actions in chapter 5 of the interim report.

AIMS considers it vital that all NHS trusts provide services that are committed to continuous improvement in safety, strong leadership with a workplace culture that challenges poor practice and cultures, and above all ensuring that women and their families are listened to.


1 ‘Ockenden Report: Emerging Findings and Recommendations from the Independent Review of Maternity Services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust’, December 2020, www.ockendenmaternityreview.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ockenden-report.pdf
2 S. Miller et al., ‘Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide’, The Lancet, 2016, www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31472-6/fulltext


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Women, Pregnancy and Artificial Int…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 By Christopher Yau, Nuffield Department for Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford on behalf of the MUM-PREDICT and OPTIMAL…

Read more

What has the AIMS Campaigns Team be…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 What has the AIMS Campaigns Team been up to this quarter? By The AIMS Campaigns Team Published written outputs: 19th August: Peer review…

Read more

Conflicting advice for pregnant wom…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 Researchers Siang Ing Lee and Ngawai Moss report on the qualitative study they conducted to inform a core outcome set for studies of preg…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: Wellbeing

AIMS is delighted to be hosting a Wellbeing workshop delivered by Ruth Weston , veteran birth activist, AIMS member and author of 'Born Stroppy Make Change Happen'. This…

Read more

Threads of Protest: Human Rights in…

It combines the talents and knowledge of members of the public, artists, professional crocheters and charitable organisations to create crochet artwork designed to challe…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: The Foundation Stone…

Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". Please follo…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

AIMS, ARM and Birthrights Open Lett…

AIMS (Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services), ARM (the Association of Radical Midwives) and Birthrights are jointly calling for action in the light of th…

Read more

NICE Intrapartum Care - Water birth…

AIMS submitted comments on the draft NICE Guideline update on Intrapartum care for Water birth: second stage of labour (August 2025). You can read the the draft here You…

Read more

AIMS Responds to NHS 10 Year Workfo…

NHS workforce planning needs to be fit for the maternity service The current system of NHS workforce planning in England is not delivering a safe, personalised and equita…

Read more