Keeping up with the updates

ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)

AIMS Journal, 2021, Vol 33, No 4

To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here.

Nadia Higson profile picture

By Nadia Higson

In March 2020 as the country went into lockdown, calls to the AIMS Helpline shot up. We were hearing from women who’d been told with almost no notice that midwifery support for a long-planned homebirth would not be provided; that they would have to attend scans alone, that they could not have their partner with them in hospital until a midwife deemed them to be in ‘active labour’ – or sometimes, even at all. It quickly became clear that, whilst some NHS Trusts were making imaginative efforts to maintain choice and ensure that pregnant women and people could have the support they needed, others seemed to have just thrown up their hands and decided that it was all too difficult.

On 9 April, NHS England published a '​Clinical guide for the temporary reorganisation of intrapartum maternity care during the coronavirus pandemic[1]'. AIMS welcomed this with the comment that “it provides a good reflection of what women are telling us they need at this difficult time, and should provide a useful guide for Trust Boards across the country.” There was much to applaud in this guidance. It included recommendations that Trusts should: publish information about their current maternity care provision in a readily accessible format; not suspend any services unless they had considered “alternative options, such as deploying returning retirees and independent midwives”; and that they should keep “as many options available for as long as possible” and “consider maintaining at least one midwifery care option”. We also welcomed the recognition of the need to prevent “avoidable perinatal mortality and morbidity (including issues relating to mental health and wellbeing)” and continue “to provide a personalised risk assessment” (for our full response see AIMS Response to the NHS Clinical Guide to Trusts on Maternity Service arrangements during the Coronavirus period[2]).

Despite this, in many areas it continued to be the case that midwifery care models disappeared or were severely restricted, blanket restrictions on supporters were being imposed, and maternity services users were struggling to find reliable information. In response to this, I hastily drafted the first version of the AIMS Coronavirus and your maternity care[3] information page – little knowing what I was letting myself in for over the next 18 months.

The first version was relatively short. It included links to the NHS England guidance, and the additional guidance which began to be published by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. It described what little was then known about the risks of coronavirus in pregnancy and for babies, and detailed what care and support (according to the guidelines) pregnant women and people should be being offered.

But then there were updates to the guidance. And further updates. And additional guidance covering particular aspects of maternity care, and new questions that needed to be addressed. My ‘baby’ started to grow at an alarming rate! At the last count it stood at about 12,000 words. It also needed constant ‘feeding,’ as every time a new version of the guidance was published or a new document came out, I had to read it, digest it and update the page. RCOG in particular had an annoying habit of publishing updates on a Friday afternoon. I lost quite a few weekends that way.

As the pandemic progressed, I discovered that the four nations of the UK were each publishing their own guidance. As AIMS is a UK-wide charity, that meant locating and including the different guidance for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and then checking at intervals to see whether anything in those had changed.

This meant that I experienced a very weird mix of feelings whenever new guidance appeared. Pleasure, when things were being clarified or positive recommendations added. Frustration when things remained unclear or seemingly unreasonable recommendations were left in – despite AIMS lobbying. And an overwhelming sinking feeling of “Oh no, I’ve got to update it again!”

But it has been worthwhile. Our website statistics show that up to March 2021, the page had been accessed almost 27,000 times – so hopefully it has helped a lot of people.

Usually, AIMS Birth Information pages go through a process of peer review before they are published, but, strangely, I found it hard to persuade anyone else to read all the guidance and check that I’d got it right – so any errors are entirely my fault. I am, however, very grateful to the various Helpline colleagues who proofread it for me, and also checked all the links every time a document was moved to a new web location.


Author Bio: Nadia Higson is an AIMS Trustee. She also volunteers as AIMS Coordinator, and as a member of the AIMS Helpline team and the Campaigns Steering Group. She was the principal author of the AIMS Guide to Induction of Labour and has written several of the Birth Information pages on the AIMS website, including “Coronavirus and your maternity care.”

She is also an NCT Practitioner and a user representative on her local Maternity Voices Partnership.


[1] madeinheene.hee.nhs.uk/Portals/0/Clinical%20guide%20for%20the%20temporary%20reorganisation%20of%20intrapartum%20maternity%20care.pdf

[2] www.aims.org.uk/campaigning/item/response-clinical-guidance-coronovirus

[3] www.aims.org.uk/information/item/coronavirus


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information. You can make donations at Peoples Fundraising. To become an AIMS member or join our mailing list see Join AIMS

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Report of Parliamentary Debate on B…

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 By Elle Gundry The first parliamentary debate on birth trauma took place in the House of Commons on Thursday 19th October 2023. [1] Thank…

Read more

Doulas supporting clients to make a…

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 By Anne Glover I work with women from all walks of life, but one thing that is important to them all, is having a positive and satisfying…

Read more

My Complaint

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 Editor’s note: In this quite shocking account of disrespect and neglect, Grace describes the arrival of her first baby. With Grace’s perm…

Read more

Events

« »

Priorities for improving maternity…

https://www.westminsterforumprojects.co.uk/conference/Maternity-24

Read more

AIMS Workshop: History of Maternity…

Join us for the an interactive online AIMS workshop " History of Maternity Care since 1950 - How did we get here? " with Dr Tania Staras . If you have ever wondered why U…

Read more

MaMA conference - 26/ 27 April 2024

MaMa Conference is the largest & longest running annual midwifery & maternity conference in the UK. Over the past 12 amazing years we have created an original and unique…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

What are the priorities for midwife…

AIMS is proud to be supporting the RCM's Research Prioritisation project as a Project Partner and with one of our volunteers on the Steering Group www.rcm.org.uk/promotin…

Read more

Parliamentary Inquiry into Birth Tr…

Introduction to AIMS and why AIMS is making a submission Since 1960, AIMS has been the leading advocate for improvements in UK maternity care. We have national and intern…

Read more

BICS Conference poster: AIMS Campai…

AIMS Campaigns Team volunteers are presenting a poster about our campaign for Physiology-Informed Maternity Services at the 2023 conference of the British Intrapartum Car…

Read more