We have continued to review and update the AIMS Birth Information page ‘Coronavirus and your maternity care’1in line with latest guidance from the NHS and the Royal Colleges. We posted about new guidance lifting some of the restrictions on birth partners and having supporters at antenatal appointments in Northern Ireland, Scotland and England. Full details of the current guidance for each of the four nations are on the webpage.
AIMS Volunteers Emma Ashworth and Verina Henchy have been in correspondence with RCOG about their guidance on waterbirth. We are pleased to see that thanks to these challenges that the latest version of the guidance now makes it clear that those who have no symptoms of COVID-19 and either do not have a test result or test negative for COVID-19 should be able to use a birth-pool. RCOG have also said that “For women who are asymptomatic but test positive, the evidence is unclear and we have made this evident in our guidance” while they seek an opinion on the evidence from the national Infection Prevention and Control team. Interestingly, they have also changed their reason for advising against use of birth-pools for those with COVID-19 symptoms from the theoretical risk of infection (for which, as Emma and Verina have pointed out, there is no evidence) to saying that necessary monitoring of their oxygen levels etc. “is better provided on land”. We will continue to ask them why this monitoring cannot be done in water.
We wrote to the Royal College of Midwives to welcome their Clinical Briefing Sheet: ‘freebirth’ or ‘unassisted childbirth’ during the COVID-19 pandemic2 but also to lodge a few concerns. You can read our letter here3 .
We supported the European Network of Childbirth Associations social media campaign #MyDecisionMustBeRespected for the International Week for Respecting Childbirth4
We welcomed the publication of the report "First do no harm"7 from the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, chaired by Baroness Cumberlege. We plan to publish a review of this important document soon.
We read the NHS constitution’s seven key principles8 that "guide the NHS in all it does". It’s well worth looking at what these say about respecting human rights, supporting disadvantaged groups and offering services “tailored to the needs and preferences of patients, their families and their carers.” In the light of the difficulties that many people have faced in finding information about maternity services changes and the decision-making process being used during the pandemic, we were particularly struck by the statement “The system of responsibility and accountability for taking decisions in the NHS should be transparent and clear to the public, patients and staff.”
AIMS Vice Chair Nadia Higson spoke at the virtual ‘Let’s Talk Birth’ Conference about how AIMS has been supporting choice in the pandemic. You can watch her presentation " target="_blank">here.9
We attended a stakeholder meeting organised by the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), and followed up our concerns about report delays and data issues by writing to Jacqueline Dunkley-Bent (Chief Midwife Officer, England) and Matthew Jolly (National Clinical Director for the Maternity Review and Women’s Health, NHS England).
We wrote to Helen Vernon, NHS Resolution, welcoming the inclusion of #ContinuityofCarer in the latest annual Maternity Incentive Scheme
The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..
AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.
We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.
AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 By Christopher Yau, Nuffield Department for Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford on behalf of the MUM-PREDICT and OPTIMAL…
AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 What has the AIMS Campaigns Team been up to this quarter? By The AIMS Campaigns Team Published written outputs: 19th August: Peer review…
AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 Researchers Siang Ing Lee and Ngawai Moss report on the qualitative study they conducted to inform a core outcome set for studies of preg…
AIMS is delighted to be hosting a Wellbeing workshop delivered by Ruth Weston , veteran birth activist, AIMS member and author of 'Born Stroppy Make Change Happen'. This…
It combines the talents and knowledge of members of the public, artists, professional crocheters and charitable organisations to create crochet artwork designed to challe…
Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". Please follo…
AIMS (Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services), ARM (the Association of Radical Midwives) and Birthrights are jointly calling for action in the light of th…
AIMS submitted comments on the draft NICE Guideline update on Intrapartum care for Water birth: second stage of labour (August 2025). You can read the the draft here You…
NHS workforce planning needs to be fit for the maternity service The current system of NHS workforce planning in England is not delivering a safe, personalised and equita…