The examination to judge the exact beginning of labour is an arbitrary judgement, and will differ from one caregiver to the next. The "beginning" of labour is not agreed upon scientifically.
The partogram has no scientific basis, and neither does standardising the 12-hour time allocation. The expected rate of increase (1 cm per hour) in all labours is a standardisation, and not proven to be applicable in all first labours. Prolonged labour can be judged only in retrospect.
Artificial rupture of the membranes, routinely carried out at early dilatation, is not recommended by numerous authorities because, like all interventions, it carries a number of risks. It must be made clear that these risks are very slight. They include bone disalignment of the baby's skull, and the potential to damage to the veins of the placenta (velamentous cord insertion).
Synthetic oxytocin is a hormone which its manufacturers recommend should be used with extreme caution, and only to simulate normal contractions, as it carries a number of potential risks for mother and baby.
Active management of labour is a policy which assumes that the capacity of women to labour is deficient and imperfect, and seeks to control and manage the event.
Editor's Note: For a view on low-tech management in a hospital setting at the Semmelweis Clinic in Vienna see the AIMS Journal 1996; 8(1): 6-8 and 18-19.
The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..
AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.
We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.
AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 3 By Ryan Jones This is a journal article about trust, and it’s also a journal article about my journey to becoming a volunteer at AIMS. I…
AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 3 By Claire Dunn I found myself sitting in the waiting room of a prestigious hospital in West London pondering what lay ahead, for I was on…
AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 3 By Alex Smith Welcome to the September 2024 issue of the AIMS journal. The theme for this quarter explores different aspects of trust enc…
Join us for an interactive online AIMS workshop, " Focusing on Induction of Labour ". Tickets are available here https://www.tickettailor.com/events/aims/1322209 Nadia Hi…
Join us for an interactive online AIMS workshop: " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". Tickets available here https:/…
For all researchers, practitioners and experts by experience interested in migrant maternal health and early childhood research. https://maternityresearch.cityofsanctuary…
AIMS has written to Wes Streeting MP, welcoming him to the role of Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. We acknowledge his awareness that maternity services are…
This is an edited version of an invited talk given by Jo Dagustun, AIMS Campaigns Team, to the International Labour and Birth Research Conference UK, 24 - 26 April 2023.…
We write this letter in response to the recently published APPG Report on Birth Trauma which can be found here The report was extremely moving and we honour the brave con…