Common Criticisms of Active Management of Labour

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal, 1998, Volume 10, No 2

Companion article to Active Management of Labour - The Irish Way of Birth

  • The examination to judge the exact beginning of labour is an arbitrary judgement, and will differ from one caregiver to the next. The "beginning" of labour is not agreed upon scientifically.
  • The partogram has no scientific basis, and neither does standardising the 12-hour time allocation. The expected rate of increase (1 cm per hour) in all labours is a standardisation, and not proven to be applicable in all first labours. Prolonged labour can be judged only in retrospect.
  • Artificial rupture of the membranes, routinely carried out at early dilatation, is not recommended by numerous authorities because, like all interventions, it carries a number of risks. It must be made clear that these risks are very slight. They include bone disalignment of the baby's skull, and the potential to damage to the veins of the placenta (velamentous cord insertion).
  • Synthetic oxytocin is a hormone which its manufacturers recommend should be used with extreme caution, and only to simulate normal contractions, as it carries a number of potential risks for mother and baby.
  • Active management of labour is a policy which assumes that the capacity of women to labour is deficient and imperfect, and seeks to control and manage the event.

Editor's Note: For a view on low-tech management in a hospital setting at the Semmelweis Clinic in Vienna see the AIMS Journal 1996; 8(1): 6-8 and 18-19.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

AIMS during the 1970s

AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 By Shane Ridley AIMS Trustee I decided to read through the 1970s , starting with the Quarterly Newsletter for September 1970 which was ty…

Read more

AIMS during the 1960s

AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Dorothy Brassington AIMS Trustee and Treasurer It has been fascinating to read the early newsletters and discover exactly what AIMS wa…

Read more

AIMS during the 1980s

AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Verina Henchy AIMS Trustee I was delighted to hear that the theme for this Journal is to look back over a 60 year history of maternity…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS 60th Anniversary Event - Confe…

POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…

Read more

ARM National Conference 2020: "How…

Chair: Professor Soo Downe, University of Central Lancashire Dr Gloria Esegbona, OBGYN and Winston Churchill Fellow 2015 Kings College Learning Institute Dr Gloria Esegbo…

Read more

NICE Annual Conference 2020

Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

AIMS submission to the Health and S…

AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee - Safety of Maternitys Services in England In July 2020, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select C…

Read more

AIMS comments on RCOG - Restoration…

A prioritisation framework for care in response to COVID-19 Version 2.1: Published Friday 26 June 2020 AIMS has welcomed the RCOG document Restoration and Recovery: prior…

Read more

AIMS' evidence to the Health and So…

AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee On April 22, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee opened an inquiry ​into the plannin…

Read more