By Nadine Edwards
Luke Zander opened the conference by telling those present that the purpose of the various fora set up by the RSM was to bring different voices into debates about specific topics and move away from the concept of expert/audience. Interestingly only the Maternity and Newborn Forum (set up in 1983) has survived, I suspect largely to do with Luke's passion and his interest in and respect for others' views.
Michel Odent gave an excellent presentation about how current research is challenging outdated views and practices. For example, we now know about the need for immediate emotional and physical contact between mother and baby after birth in order to promote bonding and health giving microbial transfer, and about the harmful impacts of unnecessary prelabour caesarean section and uterotonics. He stressed that the birthing woman cannot be 'helped', as birth is an involuntary process, but that she must be protected from inhibitory factors.
Becky Reed, Kathryn Gutteridge and Becky Brien then described models of midwifery care that do just this – in the case of the Albany Practice and the Serenity and Halcyon Birth Centres – spectacularly well. Susan Bewley continued the theme describing the skilled doctor as one rooted in relationships and life-long learning and urged us to move away from risk and blame. Cathy Warwick also advised a move away from rule bound practice and focusing on single issues – trying to 'fix' them, towards relationships and thoughtful care. Elizabeth Prochaska agreed that the only way to improve care is through social models of maternity care. Being 'stuck in a risk matrix' prevents improvement and destroys clinicians' abilities to provide good, individualised care and undermines women's decision making.
She suggested ways in which human rights can support women and midwives. Commissioner of maternity services, Diane Jones, gave an in-depth presentation on the extremely complicated commissioning structures which by comparison demonstrated why we need a publicly funded NHS with structures that support the care we know works, improves outcomes and is what women and midwives want: structures that local communities can feed into developing and that are understandable and fully accountable. The current commissioning system supports a fragmented, private system of health care. It cannot possibly support the kind of integrated care described by Becky, Kathryn and Becky, that all women need.
AIMS Journal, 2017, Vol 29 No 3 A huge welcome to readers old and new! The AIMS Journal, the backbone of our work for nearly 60 years, is now entirely available online, t…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2017, Vol 29 No 3 Jo Dagustun reports on the INFANT trial study day in October 2017 This national (central Birmingham based) free-to-attend study day on the…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2017, Vol 29 No 3 Ann Roberts shares her story of how AIMS helped her back in 1983 I first contacted AIMS 34 years ago (1983), when I was pregnant with my s…Read more
To register your interest please email firstname.lastname@example.org or keep an eye on our website https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/bookings . Earlybird bookings will open…Read more
17–21 October 2018 Further DetailsRead more
AIMS AGM 2018 All members welcome! Please email email@example.com if you plan to attend to help us to judge numbers, or if you wish to send apologies 10 for 10.30 sta…Read more
Dr. Ágnes Geréb is a Hungarian obstetrician and midwife who has been under house arrest following her support for women outside of the obstetric system. March 2018: ENCA…Read more
AIMS submitted our response to this consultation on the 23 January 2018. A number of regulators, including the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the Professional Standards A…Read more
Beverley Lawrence Beech At an AIMS AGM it is customary for the Chair to give an account of the activities of the Committee during the year. I am not going to do that this…Read more