Reclaiming Birth Rally

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

By Nadine Edwards

AIMS Journal, 2010, Vol 22 No 1

The rally took place on the bright and sunny morning of the 7th March, and attracted almost 2,000 people. The Reclaiming Midwifery rally called for the Albany model of care, and other social models of midwifery care, including caseloading midwifery practices, freestanding Birth Centres and home births, to be rolled out across the UK, as well as for more midwives to be recruited in areas where there are shortages of midwives.

When King's College Hospital management decided unilaterally to terminate its nearly 12-year contract with the Albany Midwifery Practice in November 2009, there was a public outcry. The mothers and families affected by this decision were shocked and dismayed, as were childbirth organisations and midwives in Britain and across the globe.

The Albany Midwifery Practice has long been seen as an exemplar in midwifery care. It provided continuity of care in such a way that pregnant women would get to know and trust one or two midwives who would provide all their care. Even though the families looked after were among the most disadvantaged in the country the outcomes achieved by the midwives and women were truly remarkable. The women had more home births, more normal births and few caesarean sections and forceps births. They frequently used birth pools and few needed to use drugs for pain relief. The vast majority of women breastfed their babies at birth and most continued to at least the age recommended by the DoH. Fewer babies died, only 4.9 per 1000, much lower than King's or the average rate for the area (11.4 per 1000). Not surprisingly both midwives and families were very happy with the arrangement, and the Albany Midwifery Practice was fulfilling all the outcomes aimed for by the government.

Following the unprecedented decision by King's to close the Practice, an 'Albany Mums' group was immediately set up on Facebook and has attracted nearly 700 supporters. A petition calling for the reinstatement of the Albany Midwifery Practice was signed by over 4000 people from across the world. The Albany Action Group was set up with representatives from the Albany Mums, National Childbirth Trust (NCT), Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services (AIMS) and Association of Radical Midwives (ARM). This group initiated and organised a rally called Reclaiming Midwifery, in London, which was also supported by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and Independent Midwives UK (IMUK).

King's has attempted to discredit the care provided by the Albany Midwifery Practice by claiming it is unsafe. The Albany Mums and the Albany Action Group has spent months attempting to get King's to provide evidence to support these claims, but they failed to do so and they have still failed to do so.


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

What has the AIMS Campaigns Team be…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 By The AIMS Campaigns Team Published written outputs: 8th November: AIMS Response to the NHS 10 Year Workforce Plan Consultation 11th Nov…

Read more

Antenatal Education in Imaginary Hi…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 An Editorial foreword: As an antenatal educator I would often invite the expectant parents to imagine that their baby had safely arrived…

Read more

Editorial: What is there to learn?…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 By Alex Smith Welcome to the March edition of the AIMS journal. This issue explores the question of antenatal education. Antenatal educat…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: Understanding Twin T…

Stephanie Ernst, founder of the TAPS Support Foundation, will be explaining the issues that can arise in different types of twin pregnancies, and what twins parents need…

Read more

ARM Conference 2026

Midwifery Must Matter! Honouring our past to shape our future ARM’s 50th anniversary conference At a time when UK maternity services face ongoing pressures, including mid…

Read more

Top 10 maternity research prioritie…

MIDIRS is proud to sponsor the first-ever RCM Top 10 Maternity Research Priorities Symposium. This virtual event will bring together midwives, researchers, and maternity…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

Should we appoint a Maternity Commi…

A forthcoming parliamentary debate on the petition calling for the appointment of a Maternity Commissioner ‘to improve maternity care for mums and babies’ is scheduled fo…

Read more

AIMS Submission to the National Mat…

Thank you for inviting organisations to offer evidence to the investigation. AIMS has welcomed this investigation, and we stand ready to support it, drawing on our partic…

Read more

Continuity of Carer - Speaking note…

London, Wednesday 4th March 2026 A key component of ensuring maternity service provision that is safe, personalised and equitable, is the provision of a robust and sustai…

Read more