Some Facts ...

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal, 2010, Vol 22 No 1

Compiled by Jo Murphy-Lawless

  • British maternity services are running short of 4,000 midwives at present. The Royal College of Midwives states that 'England will still be suffering a severe lack of midwives by 2012 even if Government recruitment targets for an extra 3,400 midwives are met'. 1
  • Intervention rates are rising inexorably, Caesareans now stand at 24.3% nationally. This is costly as well as poor practice. Hospital Trusts are paid £2,579 for each Caesarean section compared with £1,174 for a normal midwifery-led birth. They are paid £3,626 for a Caesarean with complications. Taxpayers fund the excessive rates of Caesareans. The WHO states a Caesarean rate of over 15% is associated with more deaths and ill-health than health gains.
  • The lack of midwives is leading to a significant number of women being left without the support they feel they require. In the Healthcare Commission's 2008 report, Towards better births: a review of maternity services in England, 25% of women stated they had been left alone during labour at a point when they felt anxious. 2
  • In badly over-stretched, under-resourced maternity services, there are increasing concerns about 'near misses', the numbers of poorer outcomes linked to extensive obstetric interventions, and less than optimum care. An independent inquiry in 2008 reported that an estimated 62,746 safety 'incidents' were recorded in English maternity units in a twelve-month period between June 2006 and May 2007, with moderate harm in 11% of cases (6,902); severe harm in 1.5% of cases (941) and death in 0.5% of cases (314 deaths). 3
  • The Albany Midwifery Practice in Peckham, south London, has been providing safe, woman-centred care for women from deeply disadvantaged backgrounds for twelve years. The Albany has been thoroughly evaluated twice, it has a far lower Caesarean section rate than King's College Hospital and a far lower perinatal mortality rate.
  • The Albany gave genuine choice to the women and babies whom it served about place of birth and choice of midwife at birth. National maternity policy states that all women should have a choice by 2009. In October, 2009, the National Childbirth Trust released a study showing that less than 5% of pregnant women in the UK are free to choose where to have their baby.4

The Albany provided safe, woman-centred care for vulnerable women who want and depend on this care for themselves and their babies. Yet King's has forced the service to close down and limited its continuity of care. Why are women being denied safe birth in one of the few pockets of genuine woman-centred midwifery-led care in Britain?


  1. RCM press release 16th April 2009
  2. Healthcare Commission (2008) Towards better births: A review of maternity services in England.
  3. O'Neill, Onora et al. (2008) Safe Birth, Everybody's Business: An independent inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England. London: King's Fund.
  4. Dodwell, Miranda and Gibson, Rod (2009) An Investigation into Choice of Place of Birth. London: National Childbirth Trust

The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email:

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information. You can make donations at Peoples Fundraising. To become an AIMS member or join our mailing list see Join AIMS

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content


« »

Report of Parliamentary Debate on B…

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 By Elle Gundry The first parliamentary debate on birth trauma took place in the House of Commons on Thursday 19th October 2023. [1] Thank…

Read more

Doulas supporting clients to make a…

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 By Anne Glover I work with women from all walks of life, but one thing that is important to them all, is having a positive and satisfying…

Read more

My Complaint

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1 Editor’s note: In this quite shocking account of disrespect and neglect, Grace describes the arrival of her first baby. With Grace’s perm…

Read more


« »

Priorities for improving maternity…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: History of Maternity…

Join us for the an interactive online AIMS workshop " History of Maternity Care since 1950 - How did we get here? " with Dr Tania Staras . If you have ever wondered why U…

Read more

MaMA conference - 26/ 27 April 2024

MaMa Conference is the largest & longest running annual midwifery & maternity conference in the UK. Over the past 12 amazing years we have created an original and unique…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

What are the priorities for midwife…

AIMS is proud to be supporting the RCM's Research Prioritisation project as a Project Partner and with one of our volunteers on the Steering Group…

Read more

Parliamentary Inquiry into Birth Tr…

Introduction to AIMS and why AIMS is making a submission Since 1960, AIMS has been the leading advocate for improvements in UK maternity care. We have national and intern…

Read more

BICS Conference poster: AIMS Campai…

AIMS Campaigns Team volunteers are presenting a poster about our campaign for Physiology-Informed Maternity Services at the 2023 conference of the British Intrapartum Car…

Read more