Elizabeth Prochaska looks at ground-breaking laws protecting the rights of women
South America is notorious for its astronomical rates of caesarean sections. It is less well-known for pioneering human rights laws. But obstetrics and human rights have collided in a remarkable new law passed in Venezuela in 2010 criminalising ‘obstetric violence’. It is described in an editorial published in the International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics by Dr Rogelio Pérez D'Gregorio, a Venezuelan obstetrician. Obstetric violence is defined in the ‘Organic Law on the Right of Women to a Life Free of Violence’ as
‘...the appropriation of the body and reproductive processes of women by health personnel, which is expressed as dehumanized treatment, an abuse of medication, and to convert the natural processes into pathological ones, bringing with it loss of autonomy and the ability to decide freely about their bodies and sexuality, negatively impacting the quality of life of women.’
It then lists specific obstetric acts that constitute obstetric violence, including forcing the woman to give birth in a supine position and using acceleration techniques and performing caesarean sections without obtaining ‘voluntary, expressed and informed consent’ of the woman. Healthcare professionals found guilty of obstretric violence are liable to a fine and will be referred to their disciplinary body.
Dr D’Gregorio does not say if anyone has yet been prosecuted for obstetric violence, but regardless of whether the new law is being widely applied, it is a very powerful social statement that endorses birthing women’s autonomy. It is rare that unwanted interventions in childbirth are characterised as violent (as opposed to traumatic or merely unpleasant), but that is, of course, how many women experience them and it is very encouraging to see the term enter the legal lexicon. Crucially, the Venezuelan definition of obstetric violence recognises that the choices women make in a medicalised system may not be freely and properly informed. They may be made under the influence of veiled threats about the safety of their child, or in response to a limited range of options presented by a doctor with a vested interest in a particular outcome. As the Venezuelan law suggests, an expansive understanding of the concept of consent needs to be adopted to address these concerns.
Dr D’Gregorio accepts that the law is appropriate in Venezuela where natural childbirth is a rarity and there is an acute problem with caesareans performed without consent. Would such a law be useful in the UK? Certainly the lack of civil litigation challenging unnecessary caesareans suggests that a culture shift needs to take place in how the law (and lawyers) perceive women’s rights in childbirth, but it must be hoped that change here can be achieved without criminalising medical professionals.
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all. AIMS does not give medical advice, but instead we focus on helping women to find the information that they need to make informed decisions about what is right for them, and support them to have their decisions respected by their health care providers. The AIMS Helpline volunteers will be happy to provide further information and support. Please email email@example.com or ring 0300 365 0663.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 Lorna Tinsley Interview by Rachel Boldero AIMS believes that an effective Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is crucial for a well-funct…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 By Wendy Jones PhD MRPharmS MBE ‘ Scientific, evidence-led information which is very up to date and relevant, and … better informed than…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 The OBS facilitators: Charlotte Gilman, Julie Gallegos, Lisa Mansour and Jayne Joyce (left to right) By Jayne Joyce IBCLC Project Lead Ox…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
This year’s AGM will be an online meeting, so we plan to keep it to two hours. However, there will be the opportunity to stay, chat and socialise with friends and colleag…Read more
AIMS has written this week to Jeremy Hunt MP, in his role as chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, as a response to the current discussion regarding a so-…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft NICE Shared decision making Guideline. You can read our comments here The details of the consultation on the draft guidelines can…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft update of the NICE Neonatal Infection Guideline. You can read our comments here . The details of the draft guidelines can be foun…Read more