Elizabeth Prochaska looks at ground-breaking laws protecting the rights of women
South America is notorious for its astronomical rates of caesarean sections. It is less well-known for pioneering human rights laws. But obstetrics and human rights have collided in a remarkable new law passed in Venezuela in 2010 criminalising ‘obstetric violence’. It is described in an editorial published in the International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics by Dr Rogelio Pérez D'Gregorio, a Venezuelan obstetrician. Obstetric violence is defined in the ‘Organic Law on the Right of Women to a Life Free of Violence’ as
‘...the appropriation of the body and reproductive processes of women by health personnel, which is expressed as dehumanized treatment, an abuse of medication, and to convert the natural processes into pathological ones, bringing with it loss of autonomy and the ability to decide freely about their bodies and sexuality, negatively impacting the quality of life of women.’
It then lists specific obstetric acts that constitute obstetric violence, including forcing the woman to give birth in a supine position and using acceleration techniques and performing caesarean sections without obtaining ‘voluntary, expressed and informed consent’ of the woman. Healthcare professionals found guilty of obstretric violence are liable to a fine and will be referred to their disciplinary body.
Dr D’Gregorio does not say if anyone has yet been prosecuted for obstetric violence, but regardless of whether the new law is being widely applied, it is a very powerful social statement that endorses birthing women’s autonomy. It is rare that unwanted interventions in childbirth are characterised as violent (as opposed to traumatic or merely unpleasant), but that is, of course, how many women experience them and it is very encouraging to see the term enter the legal lexicon. Crucially, the Venezuelan definition of obstetric violence recognises that the choices women make in a medicalised system may not be freely and properly informed. They may be made under the influence of veiled threats about the safety of their child, or in response to a limited range of options presented by a doctor with a vested interest in a particular outcome. As the Venezuelan law suggests, an expansive understanding of the concept of consent needs to be adopted to address these concerns.
Dr D’Gregorio accepts that the law is appropriate in Venezuela where natural childbirth is a rarity and there is an acute problem with caesareans performed without consent. Would such a law be useful in the UK? Certainly the lack of civil litigation challenging unnecessary caesareans suggests that a culture shift needs to take place in how the law (and lawyers) perceive women’s rights in childbirth, but it must be hoped that change here can be achieved without criminalising medical professionals.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 By Shane Ridley AIMS Trustee I decided to read through the 1970s , starting with the Quarterly Newsletter for September 1970 which was ty…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Dorothy Brassington AIMS Trustee and Treasurer It has been fascinating to read the early newsletters and discover exactly what AIMS wa…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Verina Henchy AIMS Trustee I was delighted to hear that the theme for this Journal is to look back over a 60 year history of maternity…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
Chair: Professor Soo Downe, University of Central Lancashire Dr Gloria Esegbona, OBGYN and Winston Churchill Fellow 2015 Kings College Learning Institute Dr Gloria Esegbo…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee - Safety of Maternitys Services in England In July 2020, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select C…Read more
A prioritisation framework for care in response to COVID-19 Version 2.1: Published Friday 26 June 2020 AIMS has welcomed the RCOG document Restoration and Recovery: prior…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee On April 22, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee opened an inquiry into the plannin…Read more