Caesareans and obesity

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal, 2016, Vol 28 No 4

Association between cesarean birth and risk of obesity in offspring in childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood

Changzheng Yuan, ScD et al
JAMA Pediatr. Published online September 06, 2016.
doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2385

Reviewed by Virginia Hatton

In 2013 the film Microbirthdrew attention to the growing research on caesarean birth and obesity. Now a study published in July 2016 in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics provides more evidence to support this association. Researchers used data from the Growing Up Today Study, a prospective cohort study conducted from 1996-2012. The study included 22068 children born to 15271 women.,Information was collected from the women via questionnaire when children were aged 9–14 through ages 20–28. The study used a larger sample size than similar previous studies in Germany and Canada which failed to demonstrate a statistical significance in the increased risk of obesity after caesarean birth.

This study was designed to account for potential confounders which had not been included in previous studies on this subject, particularly maternal pregnancy BMI, but also pre-pregnancy smoking and duration of breastfeeding. The study did not investigate lifestyle and behaviour factors for obesity because none precede both exposure (in this case birth by caesarean) and outcome (risk of obesity). Importantly, the study data lacked details of the specific reasons for caesareans, whether women laboured at all, what other interventions were used during labour and birth, such as artificial rupture of membranes, and antibiotic use during pregnancy or labour and delivery. It is also difficult to apply the findings of the study to the general population as the mothers were all nurses participating in a long-term health study (Nurses’ Health Study II) and the authors noted that minorities were underrepresented.

The study found that individuals born by caesarean were 15% more likely to become obese during follow-up than those born vaginally. This association was stronger (30% increased risk) among individuals without known risk factors for caesarean section (risk factors included maternal pre-pregnancy raised BMI, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, smoking, advanced maternal age, gestational age at birth, and birth weight). Vaginal birth after caesarean birth was associated with a 31% lower risk of individuals being obese compared with those born via repeat caesarean delivery. The within-family analysis showed that those born via caesarean had 64% higher odds of obesity compared with their siblings born vaginally.

This study was limited to examining the association between caesarean birth and obesity, however it did point to the growing evidence that higher risk of obesity associated with caesarean birth may be a consequence of differences in gastro-intestinal microbiota established at birth. Whether differences in microbiota in individuals are sustained long-term remains to be evaluated.

Additional research is still necessary to address whether increased rates of obesity translate to increased risk of adverse cardio-metabolic outcomes such as diabetes, heart disease or stroke among individuals born by caesarean.


Please feel free to download and share a pdf of this article. If you wish to use AIMS copyright material please see aims.org.uk/general/aims-copyright

If you found this article helpful please consider becoming an AIMS member or making a donation to support our work. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Imagining breech birth without bord…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 3 By Rixa Freeze, PhD For a long time, breech birth lived in my mind as a question I could not quite put down. It was never just a clinical…

Read more

Supporting informed choice for wome…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 3 By Amy Meadowcroft, RM, MClinRes Introduction This article uses the terms “women” and “mothers” in relation to biological sex and reprodu…

Read more

Mary Cronk MBE – Upholding the skil…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 3 By Joy Horner For those who may not be familiar with the life and work of the late, great Mrs ("My friends call me Mary”) Cronk, she was…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS book launch and workshop: The…

To celebrate the launch of the new AIMS Guide to Breech Birth we are pleased to be holding a launch event with Joy Horner, the principle author. Joy will be sharing her o…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Understanding Twin T…

Stephanie Ernst, founder of the TAPS Support Foundation, will be explaining the issues that can arise in different types of twin pregnancies, and what twins parents need…

Read more

ARM Winter National Meeting

Respect, Rights & Real Midwifery The ARM toolkit How do we not only survive but thrive in midwifery? Our winter meeting brings together midwives, students and supporters…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

Making Modern Service Frameworks: m…

By Catherine Williams, on behalf of the AIMS Campaigns Team Introduction: the Amos Review and the prospect of a Modern Service Framework for maternity The recommendations…

Read more

National maternity and neonatal ser…

By Jo Dagustun on behalf of the AIMS Campaigns Team In this briefing note, Jo offers an account of what has been happening following Wes Streeting’s 2024 commitment to ov…

Read more

Scottish Perinatal Framework: Alter…

AIMS was set to review the document Framework for maternity healthcare professionals to support individualised care for women who choose alternative/non-standard birth ch…

Read more