It may or may not have something to do with the forthcoming general election, but the problems of the National Health Service currently appear to be attracting more than their fair share of media attention.
The maternity services are not exempt from this scrutiny, as demonstrated by the Kirkup Report1 on the Morecambe Bay debacle. Amid such devastation, the midwife has not fared well. Accusations and counteraccusations about staff shortages feature prominently in a health care system of which more is being expected while, simultaneously, being pared down to the bone. In the midst of this media feeding frenzy, there have been probably well-meant attempts to present the midwife as both squeaky clean and content with her lot.2,3
Meanwhile, the NMC guidance on whistleblowing4 demonstrated more tunnel vision than insight. In such a confused and confusing environment, resilience has been presented as an essential qualification and personality characteristic for the midwife.5
Against this conflicted background, the Birth Project Group (www.pregnancyandparents.org.uk/birth-projectgroup/) has undertaken a research project to listen to the voices of midwives and midwifery students in Britain and Ireland to present an accurate portrayal of the midwife's experiences and concerns. The survey comprised a confidential online questionnaire which was publicised through midwifery journals and social media. The data are being analysed qualitatively and quantitatively to provide a complete representation of how midwives and students are facing the current challenges. This short report seeks to alert readers to this work in progress and some of the data which are beginning to emerge.
Concerns about staff shortages pervaded and underpinned many of the responses. Inevitably, these concerns related to standards not being maintained: 'Staffing always impacts quality of care ... Occasionally I believe that safety is compromised by staffing shortages.' Because of these staffing difficulties, many midwives found themselves 'doing extra' in the form of staying on duty late or taking work home with them:
'It is not unusual to miss meal breaks and be off duty late. More often than not I am off duty late due to completing management documentation which I have had to delay in order to put the care of women first ... The women may get unsafe care but woe betide if we miss filling in the Infection Control Audit!'
In this difficult environment midwives wrote of their need for interpersonal support and the benefits to them and their practice when such support was forthcoming: 'If staffing and capacity are ok, I feel well supported and communication is good.'
Those midwives, however, who could not locate such support, reported a very different and much bleaker experience:
'At this stage nothing enables me to feel supported. I feel required to survive.'
The questionnaire sought information about the midwives' and students' perceptions and experiences of 'raising concerns', which focused attention on whistle blowing. Many midwives reported that they were comfortable with the process:
'Easy reporting process and open and honest culture encouraged.'
Others, though, were less sanguine:
'I'm not sure what would happen and may never get any feedback unless I ask for it.'
'The risk midwife is always encouraging us to report incidents, then she does a monthly report and its nearly always the midwife who gets the rap.'
As has been mentioned in the literature, horizontal violence or bullying is familiar to many midwives:
'Toxic culture, "if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen" attitude, machismo midwifery, bullying, jadedness, professional ambition ... lack of love and compassion for women and midwives ... etc etc etc.'
Many midwives considered that protocols and guidelines only added to the challenges facing them:
'We are encouraged to "bend" guidelines rather than challenge those that are clearly outdated and inappropriate.'
In many of the responses to questions about what hinders good practice fear featured prominently:
'I feel walking on egg shells when I go to the unit, you never know what you walk into, there is always a frisson of fear somewhere.'
Particularly in the context of staff shortages, concerns about the welfare of women and babies were widespread:
'I am worried that I miss something important which could have a detrimental effect on the mother or baby.'
'[Concern] that someone will die.'
Midwives frequently expressed disquiet about, not only their own future in midwifery, but also the future of the midwifery profession
This brief account shows that the midwife and midwifery student respondents expressed anxiety about a wide range of aspects of their practice and the maternity services. These anxieties related to both clinical as well as organisational aspects and while some were immediate or relatively short term, others were far-reaching.
To remedy this sorry scenario midwifery needs a complete change of attitude. Midwives need to move away from the all too familiar power-based top-down arrangement. There needs to be more communityoriented partnerships which are both collaborative and involve both users and providers.
Birth Project Group.
The group is a collaboration between the Pregnancy and Parents Centre, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Edinburgh and Edinburgh Napier University.
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all. AIMS does not give medical advice, but instead we focus on helping women to find the information that they need to make informed decisions about what is right for them, and support them to have their decisions respected by their health care providers. The AIMS Helpline volunteers will be happy to provide further information and support. Please email firstname.lastname@example.org or ring 0300 365 0663.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 Lorna Tinsley Interview by Rachel Boldero AIMS believes that an effective Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is crucial for a well-funct…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 By Wendy Jones PhD MRPharmS MBE ‘ Scientific, evidence-led information which is very up to date and relevant, and … better informed than…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 The OBS facilitators: Charlotte Gilman, Julie Gallegos, Lisa Mansour and Jayne Joyce (left to right) By Jayne Joyce IBCLC Project Lead Ox…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
This year’s AGM will be an online meeting, so we plan to keep it to two hours. However, there will be the opportunity to stay, chat and socialise with friends and colleag…Read more
AIMS has written this week to Jeremy Hunt MP, in his role as chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, as a response to the current discussion regarding a so-…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft NICE Shared decision making Guideline. You can read our comments here The details of the consultation on the draft guidelines can…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft update of the NICE Neonatal Infection Guideline. You can read our comments here . The details of the draft guidelines can be foun…Read more