In Denmark, in 2012 a woman was given misoprostol to induce labour even though she specifically asked not to have it. The midwife said, ‘We do not use cytotec in this labour department, it is only used for abortions.’
They then gave her 50 microgram misoprostol (cytotec is Pfizer’s brand name for the generic drug misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1). The woman thought that she had been given the licensed drug minprostin and swallowed it. Only later did she realise that something was wrong – the dose did not match minprostin. She called the labour ward and they confirmed her fear: she had been given misoprostol.
The chief obstetrician was asked if women can have the licensed drug if they do not want misoprostol and he answered: ‘We have not taken a position on it, it depends on the situation. But you can't have everything on our shelves. Of course you can have a discussion about it and we would advise against using anything other than what is our standard treatment [misoprostol], but of course if you keep on arguing then you might get it done differently in the end.’
So what does this mean? Only those women who are strong enough to keep arguing should have an informed choice?
This is not isolated to Denmark. AIMS knows of at least two women in the UK who have been given misoprostol against their wishes. One woman whohad a prior caesarean scar suffered a rupture as a result of treatment with misoprostol as a pessary; she was under the impression that she was being treated with prostin (Pfizer’s prostin E2, a naturally occurring prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), licensed forinducing labour) for a second trimester miscarriage. She only discovered the truth after she had sustained damage. What is even more worrying is that the medical staff treating her did not seem to appreciate that the two drugs are different in composition, action and risk.
AIMS has been on the trail of misoprostol since 2001; see AIMS Journals Vol 13 No 3, Vol 14 No 4, Vol 16 No 3, Vol 17 No 1 and www.aims.org.uk/misoprostol.htm
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Jo Dagustun Mothership By Francesca Segal Chatto and Windus, 2019 288 pages £14.99 ISBN 978-1-78474-269-0 Find this…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Emma Mason Eleven Hours By Pamela Erens Published by Tin House Books 2016 ISBN 978-1941040294 176 pages Publisher's…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 4 Reviewed for AIMS by Clara Hubbard, age 12 The Breast Book: A puberty guide with a difference - it's the when, why and how of breasts By…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
The theme of IMUK's 2020 National Conference 2020 is The Science Behind The Art of Midwifery. Speakers to be announced and tickets will be released soon. Information is a…Read more
21-25 October 2020 The theme for this year's Midwifery Today conference is Birthing in Love: Everyone’s Right. Classes will include: Clinical sessions such as Hemorrhage,…Read more
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recently launched a public consultation on two draft documents they have produced. Both documents were in the…Read more
AIMS has responded to the Hull Daily Mail's article entitled, " https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/health/baby-born-bus-stop-shoelace-3571474 ". 26 November 2019 Dear E…Read more
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) plays a key role in the ongoing quality assurance and regulation of the maternity services and its staff. Effective and efficient…Read more