Face to face with the GMC

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal 2014, Vol 26, No 1

An Open Letter from Michael D Innis

It was difficult, Niall Dickson, Chief Executive and Registrar of the General Medical Council (GMC) said, for the GMC to investigate poor clinical practice unless the case was referred to them. Patient protection, he emphasised, was what the regulatory process was about, not the punishment of erring doctors.

And so I draw the attention of the GMC to the effect of poor clinical practice.

First let me make it clear. My intention of reporting this case to the GMC is to disclose what is a patently absurd medical diagnosis which is destroying the lives of hundreds, perhaps thousands of innocent and loving carers - the diagnosis 'Shaken Baby Syndrome'. This diagnosis by a group of medical professionals resulted in Judge Mr Justice MacDuff sentencing Darryl Elliott to life imprisonment for the murder of his partner's baby Amelia Bowmar.

He said:

'You have been convicted, on overwhelming evidence, of the murder of Amelia Bowmar, a little girl of 14 months whose care had been entrusted to you by your partner; her mother. Your job was to look after and protect her but, instead, she died at your hands.

'It is clear to me that because you perceived her to be misbehaving, or perhaps because you had to deal with her when she was sick, or just because you lost your temper at something wholly unconnected with her behaviour, you so violently and deliberately shook her as to the catastrophic injuries from which she died. Only you know exactly what went on inside that house on July 28 last year.

'I accept that this was a spur of the moment loss of temper and also that you did not intend to kill. I also accept that you were immediately full of remorse - although that remorse has to be seen alongside an attempt to distance yourself from what you did and a failure to acknowledge your responsibility. Your failure to tell the truth in those early hours meant that the medical teams spent time investigating other possible causes. I am satisfied that Amelia was so seriously compromised that she would have died anyway. But you were not to know that.'

How was the learned Judge to know that it was not Darryl who was not telling the truth and the diagnosis 'Shaken Baby Syndrome' was a fabricated diagnosis without the slightest scientific evidence being propagated by doctors whose seem incapable of understanding that Amelia had a disorder of the coagulation system as shown by a raised INR of 1.3, and APTT of 39.6.

This would explain the brain and other haemorrhages but the evidence was ignored by the doctors alleging murder. Until doctors learn that an abnormal PT, APTT or INR means that bleeding and fractures are inevitable false allegations of shaken baby syndrome will continue.

Their preoccupation with the Shaken Baby Syndrome hypothesis also ignored the elevation of the level of glucose in the blood and the presence of glucose in the urine of Amelia. Both these features are manifestations of an autoimmune response to antigenic stimulation as explained in the attached document.1 In this case it was the vaccines given to Amelia a few days prior to her falling ill which initiated the process.

And here is where the problem lies.

The presence of a subdural haematoma, retinal haemorrhages and encephalopathy - swelling of the brain with ischaemic changes - doctors attributed to 'nonaccidental injury' resulting from having been severely and mercilessly shaken.

The condition was given the name 'Shaken Baby Syndrome' in 1971 by a neurosurgeon Dr Guthkelch, who, unsurprisingly, could offer no other explanation for the bleeding, bruises and fractures seen in these children and incredible as it may seem, neither could the doctors in the UK who reported on Amelia a year ago. I should add there are some doctors in Australia, Canada and the USA who also have the same problem causing hundreds of innocent carers to be imprisoned. Sally Clark, Angela Canning and Trupti Patel were not the last victims of medical ignorance.

Vaccines caused the problem and Darryl Elliot was blamed. I reported the matter to the GMC and got the reply

'It would be inappropriate for the GMC to become involved in academic debate between groups of experts who hold differing opinions'.

So it is up to the Presidents of Royal Colleges of Medicine to show some leadership and instruct their members to abandon the flat earth mainstream fabrication and adopt a rational approach. More than 40 years ago Dr Archie Kalokerinos told the world tissue scurvy was the cause of the condition they were calling Shaken Baby Syndrome.2 Until the Medical Profession realizes that the Shaken Baby Syndrome is a fabricated diagnosis without a shred of scientific evidence they are going to continue to falsely accuse innocent people and deceive the Judiciary.

How much longer can this shameful situation continue? Parliament has an excellent example of a false conviction in the case of Darryl Elliot and should take the opportunity to rectify the situation and restore justice to people of the land and release all falsely convicted prisoners.

My intention in making a report to the GMC was to force the medical profession to realize the enormity of the distress they were inflicting on innocent people by their actions.

Michael D Innis MBBS; DTM&H; FRCPA; FRCPath

References

  1. Innis MD (2013) Autoimmune Tissue Scurvey Misdiagnosed as Child Abuse. Clinical Medicine Research. Vol. 2, No. 6.
  2. Kalokerinos A (1974) Every Second Child. Thomas Nelson (Australia) Limited.

The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Disrupting breastfeeding confidence…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 By Alex Smith An increasing number of new mothers begin breastfeeding following a long drawn-out process of induction of labour. Currentl…

Read more

Editorial: Thinking about breastfee…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 Welcome to the September 2025 issue of the AIMS journal. The theme for this quarter is breastfeeding. An important issue that emerged as…

Read more

A Conversation with Kate Evans, aut…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 Interview by Catharine Hart Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed by AIMS, Kate. I love that this book doesn't try to sound authoritat…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS AGM

AIMS AGM 2025 All members welcome to join us in London or online - further details to follow in AIMS Members Mailing. Please email admin@aims.org.uk if you plan to attend…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: The Foundation Stone…

Join us for an interactive online AIMS workshop: " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". In this workshop discussion we…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Make Change Happen

AIMS is delighted to be hosting a series of Tools for Change campaigning workshops to be led by Ruth Weston. Ruth's journey of Birth Activism and Maternity Service Campai…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

What does the Government’s 10-year…

The Government’s 10-year health plan for England ‘ Fit for the Future ’, launched in July 2025, is the outcome of the large-scale ‘Change NHS’ consultation that began in…

Read more

AIMS Letter to Wes Streeting to wel…

AIMS has written to Wes Streeting MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to welcome his announcement of a National Maternity Review, offer our support for the…

Read more

AIMS review of the Big Baby trial

Introduction There has long been uncertainty over whether there is any benefit to early induction of labour when a baby is suspected to be ‘big’, known as ‘Large for Gest…

Read more