AIMS Journal 2007, Vol 19, No 3
Ann Keen (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health) has stated that there are '474 more consultants in obstetrics and gynaecology [than in] 1997'. Consultant obstetricians have slowly increased their numbers since the majority of women were vigorously 'encouraged' to be delivered in hospital.
What have been the 'benefits' of this increase?
Since 1977 the caesarean section rates have increased from 7.1 to 21.5% and currently the CS rates for maternity units ranged from 10% to 65%. (NICE guidelines).
Normal birth has declined since women were hospitalised for birth and since 1990 has declined further from fewer than 60% to fewer than 50%.
Routine episiotomy which, in some hospitals exceeded 90% for first time mothers, was only reduced following consumer pressure and research by midwives.
Under consultant care only 1 in 6 primigravidas and only 1 in 3 women expecting subsequent babies will have a normal birth. (Downe S, 2001)
Suicide is the leading cause of maternal death. (Confidential Inquiry, 2004).
In 1990 the NHS spent and estimated £52,000,000 on medical negligence cases and by 2007 the expenditure on maternity cases has risen to £4.49 billion. (Lord Patel, RCOG, 2007).
The Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy revealed that obstetricians were responsible for 49% avoidable mistakes compared with 18% hospital midwives and 6% community midwives
While, undoubtedly, there are women and babies alive today as a direct result of appropriate obstetric care, unfortunately, the majority of fit and healthy women have paid a heavy price for those interventions many of which were, and still are, introduced with little or no evidence of benefit for the woman or the baby.
The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..
AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.
To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk
We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.