Jo Murphy-Lawless sends news on Ireland’s midwifery unit closures
Bleak news from Ireland became still more bleak last week. Following the downgrading and closure of two of our six midwifery-led initiatives to support women in good birthing, we learned that Cavan Midwifery-Led Unit was to be closed without any public discussion.
Cavan is one of only two MLUs in the Republic (the other is in Drogheda, also in the northeast of the country.) Cavan opened in 2005 after tremendous work by the Kinder Maternity Task Force, a pioneering effort to bring midwifery-led care into being.
Both MLUs were the subject of a full-scale randomised controlled trial commissioned by the Health Services Executive (HSE), the Mid U Study, which reported in 2009 with excellent data on the favourable outcomes for women using the MLUs. Even within the restrictive conditions governing these two MLUs, outcomes proved MLU care at least as safe for women as birth in the consultant-led units to which they are attached, with far fewer interventions, and they are, economically, more cost-efficient.
The HSE, now focused on ‘savings’, saw closure as a ‘cost-cutting measure’. Medical opponents to the unit saw it as their good chance. The Caesarean section rate in the consultant unit in Cavan currently stands at 28.3%, above even the national average in Ireland of 27%. There was not a whisper about savings to be made in that arena, but then that is the purview of much lucrative private obstetric practice.
The HSE argument was that the MLU was ‘underutilised’. What was left unsaid was that local GPs and obstetricians have consistently failed to support Cavan MLU or to refer women to the MLU. Its sister MLU in Drogheda, sixty miles away, has a waiting list of women anxious to receive evidence-based woman-centred care.
Feverish behind-the-scenes activity gained a temporary reprieve on 16 December 2011, with some tough targets to meet, but the questions remain: why are women in Cavan not being told what the women in Drogheda clearly know about genuine midwifery care? How can we keep this care from vanishing?
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all. AIMS does not give medical advice, but instead we focus on helping women to find the information that they need to make informed decisions about what is right for them, and support them to have their decisions respected by their health care providers. The AIMS Helpline volunteers will be happy to provide further information and support. Please email email@example.com or ring 0300 365 0663.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 Lorna Tinsley Interview by Rachel Boldero AIMS believes that an effective Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is crucial for a well-funct…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 By Wendy Jones PhD MRPharmS MBE ‘ Scientific, evidence-led information which is very up to date and relevant, and … better informed than…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 4 The OBS facilitators: Charlotte Gilman, Julie Gallegos, Lisa Mansour and Jayne Joyce (left to right) By Jayne Joyce IBCLC Project Lead Ox…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft update of the NICE Neonatal Infection Guideline. You can read our comments here . The details of the draft guidelines can be foun…Read more
In many parts of the country, there is now momentum building in favour of the implementation of a relational model of maternity care. This is something that AIMS has been…Read more
AIMS has submitted comments on the draft update of the NICE Caesarean Section Guideline You can read our comments here The details of the draft and update schedule can be…Read more