The Night that was neither Silent nor Holy

ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)

To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here

AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 30, No 4

By Beth Whitehead

I seem to struggle a great deal with flashbacks and anger about my births around my children’s birthdays and Christmas. The latter caught me by surprise. I thought the trouble I had the Christmas before was because it was close to my second birth. With all the tinsel and sparkles, I couldn’t feel much joy or excitement, and I was hardly functional on Christmas day. Having graphic scenes of birth and glowing scenes with sentiments of immaculate midwives on recurring ads by a major nappy brand just got too much for me. Sentiment by association sells I suppose, but a quick visit on the brand’s Twitter page saw other women in a similar situation to me who found the graphic details triggering and unnecessary for TV too.

It is difficult to escape the thought of birth when many of the festive songs are about Christ being born, the holiness and silence of the night and the juxtaposition for me. I hope Mary was not expected to birth in silence. At my own births, a number of midwives made comments about me being loud (they even recorded this in my notes), having a low pain threshold and moving around too much. It was completely unprofessional and unkind. A birthing woman should be free to make as much noise or move how she likes. Birth was never meant to be judged by anyone. The people who think that they have the right to judge those giving birth are not safe to have around. They fail to make women feel safe by denying their inner knowledge.

Very often I see discussions of poor treatment of birthing women accompanied by a disclaimer that health care providers are well-meaning, have difficult jobs to do and didn’t mean to cause harm. This does not really help anyone. There are layers and layers of people who defend health providers’ practice. They even get to write in our maternity notes, a legal document, about what happened to us in pregnancy and birth. Words that may not always be fully reflective of our experience but can still be used as evidence. Their version of the “truth”.

These are full grown, educated adults who know full well their position of perceived authority and influence. They have a choice in how they treat another human being. In my experience, when I said NO, I didn’t want to be touched or given a certain medication, I expected to be respected because it was my decision. When someone forced entry to my room, coerced and deceived me to carry out protocols, well-meaning or not, abuse, assault and human rights violations took place.

We need to be honest in the narratives of birth abuses and stop excusing them. Only by acknowledging the realities of unbalanced power dynamics, the lack of professional accountability, the obscure ideas of birth/how women should birth and acknowledge that poor attitudes towards women exist, can they be addressed. Birth can be painful and exhausting, like running a marathon, but it doesn't have to be traumatic. The kind of hurt and trauma that insensitive words, forceful actions and lack of compassion, respect and dignity cause are mostly preventable. They are in the control of the health care providers.

Our healthcare system has got to get better at treating women well when we need its care and support the most. We have every right to be angry, and to demand better. Not every woman wants to be subjected to the highly medicalised model of birth. A model which benefits pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies, while bankrupting the NHS and hurting mums and babies that would have had better outcomes if their physiological births were genuinely supported. Choosing where to birth, home, midwife-led unit, hospital, stables, etc. is an expectant mother and her baby’s birth right. It should be supported.

My daughter walked over cuddling her new doll and said, “Mummy, what are you doing?” I held her hand and looked into her eyes. I wanted to say, you were born out of love, to be loved, and not meant to be an object to be abused by people. This world needs to change to respect women and human rights. The war on birth freedom is not yet over. We must break the silence so obstetric violence can be addressed and peace will return to women and families. I went into the kitchen and lit a candle to remember all the women and babies that have been harmed. I pray that one day, the wounds in our hearts and on our bodies will heal, and the freedom to birth will return.


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Disrupting breastfeeding confidence…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 By Alex Smith An increasing number of new mothers begin breastfeeding following a long drawn-out process of induction of labour. Currentl…

Read more

Editorial: Thinking about breastfee…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 Welcome to the September 2025 issue of the AIMS journal. The theme for this quarter is breastfeeding. An important issue that emerged as…

Read more

A Conversation with Kate Evans, aut…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 3 Interview by Catharine Hart Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed by AIMS, Kate. I love that this book doesn't try to sound authoritat…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: The Foundation Stone…

Join us for an interactive online AIMS workshop: " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". In this workshop discussion we…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Make Change Happen

AIMS is delighted to be hosting a series of Tools for Change campaigning workshops to be led by Ruth Weston. Ruth's journey of Birth Activism and Maternity Service Campai…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: Focusing on Inductio…

Join us for an interactive online AIMS workshop, " Focusing on Induction of Labour ". Nadia Higson (principal author of "The AIMS Guide to Induction of Labour") and Debbi…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

What does the Government’s 10-year…

The Government’s 10-year health plan for England ‘ Fit for the Future ’, launched in July 2025, is the outcome of the large-scale ‘Change NHS’ consultation that began in…

Read more

AIMS Letter to Wes Streeting to wel…

AIMS has written to Wes Streeting MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to welcome his announcement of a National Maternity Review, offer our support for the…

Read more

AIMS review of the Big Baby trial

Introduction There has long been uncertainty over whether there is any benefit to early induction of labour when a baby is suspected to be ‘big’, known as ‘Large for Gest…

Read more