Perineums and positions

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal, 2016, Vol 28 No 4

Perineal injuries and birth positions among 2992 women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth.
Edqvist et al, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2016) 16:196

Reviewed by Gemma McKenzie

The study

The researchers aimed to explore the prevalence of perineal injuries at home births. Between 2008 and 2013, 2992 women in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Iceland, women who had low risk pregnancies, spontaneous labours, and either had a planned home birth or planned a home birth and transferred into hospital were studied. The attending midwife answered a questionnaire one week after the birth. Women who ended up with a caesarean section or instrumental delivery in hospital were not included in the study. The questionnaire captured:

  • Demographic data
  • Birth position.
    This was divided into two categories:
    Flexible sacrum positions
    These positions expand the pelvic outlet and take weight off the sacrum (the large triangular bone at the base of the spine) – kneeling, standing, all-fours, squatting, using the birth seat, lateral (lying on one side).
    Non-flexible sacrum positions
    Semi-recumbent (reclining), lithotomy/supine (lying on one’s back).
  • Perineal injuries.
    These were reported as:
    Non-sutured injuries (no tear at all, small abrasions or minor injuries)
    Sutured injuries (stitches)
    Severe perineal trauma (SPT was defined as involving the anal sphincter complex).

Four major points emerged from the study.

There was a low prevalence of SPT and episiotomy, which did not differ between the countries. This adds to the growing body of evidence that suggests home birth for women with low risk pregnancies is associated with positive maternal outcomes and low levels of

Episiotomy was associated with giving birth in a nonflexible sacrum position. Interestingly, however, 30% (nine women) of the women who underwent an episiotomy did so in positions other than semi-recumbent or supine. These positions included lateral, squatting, and all fours, with five of the episiotomies taking place under water (presumably in the birthing pool).

No association was found between flexible sacrum positions and SPT or sutured injuries.

The most frequently used birth position was kneeling (24.6%). However, for primiparous women (those that have not given birth before), the most frequent position used was semi-recumbent (29.06%), followed by kneeling (19.1%).

AIMS Comments
One limitation to the study was that midwives were only asked to document women’s positions at the moment the baby was born, presumably when the baby leaves the mother’s body. Perhaps of relevance to perineal injuries would be (where possible) to have also documented the positions a woman adopted while pushing her baby down the birth canal (including the duration of the pushing stage), during crowning, when the shoulders emerged and then finally the position during ‘birth’. Taking this wider view of birth may incorporate
factors that could have an effect on perineal trauma, whilst also avoiding the presumption that women birth statically.

The researchers also admit to limitations within the study. Importantly, it is impossible to know how the attending midwife influenced the woman’s birthing position. Further, there is a lack of information as to whether skilled midwives were adopting practices that prevented perineal injuries during birth. There is also a lack of information as to whether midwives’ experience and training enabled them to accurately assess and classify the perineal injuries, especially as midwives from four different countries were entering the data.

Regardless of the limitations however, this study reinforces the message that where a woman births can affect the likelihood of interventions and the extent of any perineal injuries she sustains more than the position she adopts to do birth her baby.

Latest Content


« »

Editorial - Induction: Indispensabl…

AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 1 By Journal editors Emma Ashworth and Katie Hickey 'Speed Them Up' Kindly donated for AIMS' use by Susan Merrick Can there simultaneously…

Read more

Labour Induction at Term – How grea…

AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 1 By Debbie Chippington Derrick and Nadia Higson It is very common for women to be told they need to have their labour induced before 42 we…

Read more

Induction: First do no harm

AIMS Journal, 2019, Vol 31, No 1 By Katie Hickey One of the most well-known medical sayings is, “First, do not harm”. This phrase appears in the Hippocratic Corpus, speci…

Read more


« »

AIMS Volunteers Meeting

Details TBC

Read more

Midwifery Today Conference - “Creat…

Blankenberge, Belgium • 30 October – 3 November 2019 This is expected to be a popular event with a diverse, international audience and plenty of opportunities to network.…

Read more

ARM Annual Gathering and Retreat

September 20, 2019 @ 3:00 pm – September 27, 2019 @ 12:00 pm Join ARM for a night or a week at a house in Snowdonia and have the opportunity to discuss the midwifery issu…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

Letter to The Guardian in response…

Sent 9th May 2019 By email ( ) Dear Sir, I write in response to the opinion piece by Barbara Ellen entitled “Meghan Markle’s home birth s…

Read more

AIMS Response to MBRRACE-UK Report…

Download PDF MBRRACE-UK: Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care MBRRACE-UK: Perinatal Mortality Surveillance report for births in 2016…

Read more

Implementing Better Births: Continu…

Download PDF Commissioners and providers across England, guided by their MVPs, are working across the country to implement sustainable Continuity of Carer models of care,…

Read more