Security for Who?

ISSN 0256-5004 (Print)

AIMS Journal, 1995/6, Vol 7 No 4

In December 1995, the new Chief Inspector of prisons, General Sir David Ramsbotham, took the unprecedented step of withdrawing his inspection team from Holloway prison.

This was because of “over-zealous security, prisoners being locked in their cells 23 hours a day, poor health care, bullying, low staff morale, inadequate education and activities, and very dirty conditions." (THE TIMES, 19 Dec. 1995)

This treatment relates to a woman, Ann, who was imprisoned for 18 months following a DSS fraud. She already had two children. These children were taken into care until the release of their father from prison who was serving a shorter sentence for the same fraud.

ANN’S EXPERIENCE

Ann had a history of problems with pregnancy. Nonetheless she was required to attend antenatal classes in handcuffs, despite representations from her husband and GP about the stress it may place on her and the impact it may have on her pregnancy.

Ann said that during one trip to hospital she suffered jibes from an escorting officer which she ignored. A little later she went to the bathroom to shower. First of all she was chained to the railings in the bathroom. Ann said she felt like a dog chained to a post. She was subsequently attached to a female escorting officer by a closeting chain. Ann told the Howard league that whilst she was washing, the female officer continually opened the door to check on her even though the only way out of the bathroom was through that door. Every time the door opened the other escorting officer, who was male, could also see into the bathroom.

Ann commented on this and the female officer is alleged to have come into the bathroom and grabbed Ann's hand. A fight was alleged to have followed which ended with Ann being fully restrained with an officer putting pressure on her back whilst she was laid on her stomach Ann told us several hospital staff witnessed what happened. Ann also received an injury to her ear which required medical treatment.

Shortly after it was discovered that Ann had a hole in her womb and therefore needed to be hospitalised. Throughout this period, Ann was cuffed to officers day and night which she said was extremely stressful and her blood pressure rose.

At 27 weeks Ann went into labour. The baby was 2 months premature but there were complications and the baby had an infection. Ann visited her daughter daily until the baby had to be rushed to a specialist children’s facility. Ann was escorted in cuffs to this hospital separately from her baby as the escorting officers would not allow her to accompany her child. Ann arrived at the hospital at 3.30pm, but at 3.45pm she was told that she would have to return to prison as the officers were due to go off duty. When her baby arrived at the hospital, medical staff were unable to operate as they were unable to obtain authorisation from Ann who had been taken back to prison. Eventually Ann was contacted and two prison staff volunteered to return to the hospital with her. Ann’s baby died.

Following the alleged fight at the hospital, the officer filed a complaint against Ann. An adjudication followed and Ann lost her private cash for three weeks and had 21 days added to the length of her sentence.

Ann had also complained via the prison request/complaint process. Ann wanted to attend her child's funeral which was to take place at 11am. lt is alleged that the van taking her to the funeral did not leave the prison until 11.15am. It has been suggested to the Howard League that this delay was deliberate. The priest delayed the service until Ann arrived. Ann attended the funeral handcuffed.

Because of the nature of Ann's Offence she was due to move to an open prison but since the incident with the prison officer, she has been regarded as a threat to prison officers and therefore unsuitable for open conditions. She is now in another closed women's prison.

Ann's problems were further compounded by the fact that the first prison did not allow her counselling to come to terms with the death of her baby and her current prison, just two months after the death of her baby, stopped her counselling. Ann told us that the prison said she was strong enough to cope.

The Howard League for Penal Reform


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

What has the AIMS Campaigns Team be…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 By The AIMS Campaigns Team Published written outputs: 8th November: AIMS Response to the NHS 10 Year Workforce Plan Consultation 11th Nov…

Read more

Antenatal Education in Imaginary Hi…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 An Editorial foreword: As an antenatal educator I would often invite the expectant parents to imagine that their baby had safely arrived…

Read more

Editorial: What is there to learn?…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 1 By Alex Smith Welcome to the March edition of the AIMS journal. This issue explores the question of antenatal education. Antenatal educat…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: Focusing on Inductio…

Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops, " Focusing on Induction of Labour ". Nadia Higson (principal author of "The AIMS Guide to Induction of…

Read more

ARM Conference 2026

Midwifery Must Matter! Honouring our past to shape our future ARM’s 50th anniversary conference At a time when UK maternity services face ongoing pressures, including mid…

Read more

Top 10 maternity research prioritie…

MIDIRS is proud to sponsor the first-ever RCM Top 10 Maternity Research Priorities Symposium. This virtual event will bring together midwives, researchers, and maternity…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

Should we appoint a Maternity Commi…

A forthcoming parliamentary debate on the petition calling for the appointment of a Maternity Commissioner ‘to improve maternity care for mums and babies’ is scheduled fo…

Read more

AIMS Submission to the National Mat…

Thank you for inviting organisations to offer evidence to the investigation. AIMS has welcomed this investigation, and we stand ready to support it, drawing on our partic…

Read more

Continuity of Carer - Speaking note…

London, Wednesday 4th March 2026 A key component of ensuring maternity service provision that is safe, personalised and equitable, is the provision of a robust and sustai…

Read more