Free-standing birth centres encourage the practice of real midwifery. In an ideal world we would like to see birth centres all over
the country with case load midwives attached to them. One of our problems is that hospitals have now hijacked the terminology
so that we have ‘birth centres’, ‘midwifery led units’ and - worst of all - 'home from home' units in hospital.
On 12 December the BBC news website reported that the Conservative party believes 21 midwife-led and 22 consultant-led
maternity units across the UK may be under threat, most of them in England. The Royal College of Midwives, the National Childbirth
Trust and the Birth Choice UK website are also making efforts to maintain up-to-date lists on closures and service reconfigurations.
AIMS believes it is vital for research and audit purposes that there is a national, up-to-date and freely available list, and
will be asking the Department of Health and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit to commit to doing this.
Such a list would allow anyone with an interest in improving maternity services to have an overview. It would also encourage
people to look beyond their own area when considering the impact of proposed closures. Free-standing birth centres in neighbouring
counties - Wantage (Oxfordshire), Andover (Hampshire) and Devizes (Wiltshire) - are all under threat and there is no
strategy to look at the overall provision. This does not look like a NATIONAL Health Service.
We particularly welcome Mavis Kirkham’s article because it puts the political situation in a nutshell. We are also pleased to read
about the dramatic decline in the Montrose Community Maternity Unit’s intrapartum transfer rate, as high barriers to entry and
disappointingly high transfer rates have been notable features of many free-standing midwifery units. This is crucial stuff.
Free-standing midwifery units are not the icing on the cake - they are the key to enhancing and supporting normal birth and real
midwifery. They can provide the hub for community based care, with the midwives in the community carrying their own case
loads and working in small teams, free from the shackles of providing ‘on call’ for the labour wards (or any other hospital shortfall).
Our challenge for 2007 is to get this idea into the heads of the grey suits on the Trust Boards.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 By Shane Ridley AIMS Trustee I decided to read through the 1970s , starting with the Quarterly Newsletter for September 1970 which was ty…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Dorothy Brassington AIMS Trustee and Treasurer It has been fascinating to read the early newsletters and discover exactly what AIMS wa…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Verina Henchy AIMS Trustee I was delighted to hear that the theme for this Journal is to look back over a 60 year history of maternity…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
Chair: Professor Soo Downe, University of Central Lancashire Dr Gloria Esegbona, OBGYN and Winston Churchill Fellow 2015 Kings College Learning Institute Dr Gloria Esegbo…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee - Safety of Maternitys Services in England In July 2020, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select C…Read more
A prioritisation framework for care in response to COVID-19 Version 2.1: Published Friday 26 June 2020 AIMS has welcomed the RCOG document Restoration and Recovery: prior…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee On April 22, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee opened an inquiry into the plannin…Read more