Radcliffe Publishing, 2006, Paperback: 144 pages (ISBN-10: 1 84619 095 9 / ISBN-13: 978-1846190957) £19.95
Reviewed by Avril Nicoll; user representative at Montrose Community Maternity Unit and a member of the Birth Centre Network UK.
As you would expect from a Reader in Normal Birth whose work on free-standing birth centres is regularly referenced, this is a terrific book. It draws together issues Denis Walsh has explored in various papers based on his ethnographic research in a small, freestanding birth centre, and adds context, detail and a sense of wholeness.
I was first introduced to the qualitative research method of ethnography through a paper in my professional field, speech and language therapy. I was struck by the way it demanded and facilitated a deep level of observation and reflection from the researcher, which made the situations described instantly recognisable to the reader and meaningful in a new but practical way. This book will be invaluable to midwifery leaders and midwives. Those who already practise in a woman-centred way will get affirmation and insight, and those who feel the need to prove their worth by doing things to women will be challenged to do things differently.
While the book is unlikely to be on the reading list of commissioners or people steeped in the acute mentality, it is essential reading for maternity activists who will be taking its messages out to decision-makers and ser vices. At first I felt uncomfor table with the impression that the midwives concerned didn't have enough to do with their time, but the later exploration of the difference between 'being' and 'doing' gave me added insight into the strength of my own reactions to the midwifery involvement during my pregnancy and birth experiences. In par ticular it brought back memories of how the hard work of a midwife 'being' had made the difference between me being able to breastfeed my younger son and being left with the scars of failure. The examples of how to 'be' rather than 'do' - and the way this influences outcomes - were enlightening, and I would like to have seen more of them included. I hope they will encourage people associated with free-standing bir th centres to write about similar experiences so we can build up more shared knowledge of how to do 'being' well.
The interesting concept of free-standing bir th centres as 'matrescent' is a key theme. An unintended effect was to make me think more positively about my own way of 'being' a mother, rather than feeling that I don't 'do' enough!
An audit of free-standing bir th centre outcomes is underway in Scotland (see p.9) and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit is running a prospective study of outcomes in midwifery-led and consultant-led units in England. Meanwhile, Professor Soo Downe and colleagues hope to run a feasibility study for a preference-based randomised trial of place of bir th. While quantitative research is necessary to improve our understanding of the outcomes we could and should be aiming for, this book shows that qualitative research methods give us the clues for how we get there.
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 By Shane Ridley AIMS Trustee I decided to read through the 1970s , starting with the Quarterly Newsletter for September 1970 which was ty…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Dorothy Brassington AIMS Trustee and Treasurer It has been fascinating to read the early newsletters and discover exactly what AIMS wa…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2020, Vol 32, No 3 by Verina Henchy AIMS Trustee I was delighted to hear that the theme for this Journal is to look back over a 60 year history of maternity…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
Chair: Professor Soo Downe, University of Central Lancashire Dr Gloria Esegbona, OBGYN and Winston Churchill Fellow 2015 Kings College Learning Institute Dr Gloria Esegbo…Read more
Registration for the NICE Annual Conference 2020 will open on 22 January 2020. For more details and to register your interest, please visit http://www.niceconference.org.…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee - Safety of Maternitys Services in England In July 2020, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select C…Read more
A prioritisation framework for care in response to COVID-19 Version 2.1: Published Friday 26 June 2020 AIMS has welcomed the RCOG document Restoration and Recovery: prior…Read more
AIMS' evidence to the Health and Social Care Select Committee On April 22, the UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee opened an inquiry into the plannin…Read more