How can digital consultations best be used in maternity care?

ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 1

Georgia Clancy and Catrin Evans

By Dr Georgia Clancy and Professor Catrin Evans

Since the publication of Better Births in 2016, maternity services in England have been undergoing changes. Overseen by the Maternity Transformation Programme, the aim has been to create safer and more personalised care. To achieve these goals, the Maternity Transformation Programme developed 10 core work streams. One of these workstreams was ‘harnessing digital technology’.[1] In recent years the Covid-19 pandemic accelerated this digital policy imperative. One of the most commonly reported Covid-related changes to maternity services has been an increase in the use of digital (remote) consultations. In particular, the use of telephone or video-calling.[2],[3]

As digital clinical consultations have become more widespread in maternity services, national guidance has quickly been developed. However, the ways in which digital consultations can best be used remains unclear. A particular concern is to ensure that the increased use of digital consultations is safe and does not lead to inequalities in care.

The ARM@DA project[4] explored the use of digital consultations in maternity care. As a realist review,[5] the aim was to understand when, where, and for whom digital consultations could be used to ensure safe, effective and acceptable care. To do this, the project carried out a review of the existing evidence on digital consultations. It also conducted consultations with stakeholders (service users, community organisations and maternity healthcare professionals).

What we found

The study found that there are some key factors to consider in order for digital consultations to work well. The first was the organisational infrastructure and resources provided to support digital consultations, for example, healthcare professionals need to have access to the necessary technology (e.g. digital devices and WiFi) when working onsite and in the community, appropriate workspaces in which to conduct digital consultations (e.g. private and quiet), and NHS systems set up to support hybrid care. This can impact how digital consultations are put into practice and how staff respond to the change.

The second consideration is training and support for staff. This can help to optimise safety, uptake and sustained use of digital consultations. This means providing ongoing access to clinical, administrative and technical support to keep things running smoothly. It is also important to communicate with staff about how and why they could be using digital consultations, as well as providing guidance to aid decision-making.

Third is providing personalisation and flexibility for women. This is so that digital consultations can better adapt care to meet individual needs and life circumstances. Key here is supporting choice and empowerment, and meeting individual needs. This can help digital consultations to be viewed as a valuable addition to traditional maternity care.

Fourth is recognising some of the challenges a diverse population of women might face in accessing digital consultations and what can be done to overcome these challenges. For example, increasing women’s knowledge of maternity services can help them to navigate care more easily. Supporting those who face language and communication barriers can facilitate access to services. It is also important to consider the best way of interacting with service users if they have limited access to digital resources.

Finally, the review found that relationship-focussed connections are central to delivering quality digital care. Managing relationships and building rapport between professionals and service users digitally can be difficult. Evidence shows that digital consultations can be used most effectively and safely when the relationship between the woman and health professional is already established. This can provide women with a sense of support, comfort and control in their care (potentially including at-home monitoring), in turn, improving satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

The size and complexity of the maternity care system means that there is no one-size fits all approach to using digital consultations in maternity care. However, based on our findings we have developed some ‘CORE’ implementation principles:

CORE graphic (Create the right environment, infrastructure and support for staff; Optimise consultations to be  responsive, flexible and personalised; Recognise the importance of access and inclusion; Enable quality and safety through relationship-focussed connections)As part of the ARM@DA project we have developed a free e-learning resource based around these CORE principles. The e-learning resource is suitable for anyone interested in best practice principles for digital consultations, but particularly healthcare professionals. Access it here: www.nottingham.ac.uk/helmopen/rlos/practice-learning/midwifery/telehealth/armada/index.html


The ARM@DA project: The ARM@DA project was led by Professor Catrin Evans at the University of Nottingham. Dr Georgia Clancy was the research fellow on the project. ARM@DA was supported by colleagues from the University of Nottingham, University of Sheffield, University of Bradford and the Nottingham Maternity Research Network.6] The project also drew on the expertise of a range of stakeholders including maternity healthcare professionals, service users and third sector organisations (Sister Circle and the National Autistic Society). For more information about ARM@DA please visit the project website4 or follow @ARMADA_Project1.[7]

This work is supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme, grant number: NIHR134535. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.


[1] NHS England. Maternity Transformation Programme, www.england.nhs.uk/mat-transformation

[2] Jardine J, Relph S, Magee LA, et al. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care. BJOG 2020 2020/09/30. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16547

[3] Sanders J, Blaylock R and WRISK Study Team. Users’ experiences of COVID-19 maternity service changes (Version 2). 2020

[4] The ARM@DA project (2024) A realist inquiry into maternity care at a distance https://armada-project.co.uk

[5] WONG G. Realist reviews in health policy and systems research. Evidence synthesis for health policy and systems: a methods guide. World Health Organization, 2018

[6] Nottingham Maternity Research Network: www.nottsmaternity.ac.uk

[7] Follow the ARM@DA Project on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Armada_project1


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services.

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Sovereignty of the Body: Birth, Int…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Tamara Blakemore The First Breath I’m a birth artist, and apparently I’m here to talk about the sovereignty of the body, which feels s…

Read more

Scottish Maternity Update: Review o…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Camille Del Pozo and Anne Glover on behalf of the AIMS Campaigns Team Background AIMS wrote to Neil Gray, the Cabinet Secretary for He…

Read more

The sovereignty of the body in preg…

AIMS Journal, 2026, Vol 38, No 2 By Alex Smith Welcome to the June 2026 edition of the AIMS journal. This issue is about the sovereignty of the body in pregnancy and chil…

Read more

Events

« »

ARM Conference 2026

Midwifery Must Matter! Honouring our past to shape our future ARM’s 50th anniversary conference At a time when UK maternity services face ongoing pressures, including mid…

Read more

Top 10 maternity research prioritie…

MIDIRS is proud to sponsor the first-ever RCM Top 10 Maternity Research Priorities Symposium. This virtual event will bring together midwives, researchers, and maternity…

Read more

South Asian Maternal Health Confere…

South Asian women continue to experience disproportionately poor outcomes in maternal and neonatal care with overwhelming evidence that these disparities are driven by sy…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

Should we appoint a Maternity Commi…

A forthcoming parliamentary debate on the petition calling for the appointment of a Maternity Commissioner ‘to improve maternity care for mums and babies’ is scheduled fo…

Read more

AIMS Submission to the National Mat…

Thank you for inviting organisations to offer evidence to the investigation. AIMS has welcomed this investigation, and we stand ready to support it, drawing on our partic…

Read more

Continuity of Carer - Speaking note…

London, Wednesday 4th March 2026 A key component of ensuring maternity service provision that is safe, personalised and equitable, is the provision of a robust and sustai…

Read more