AIMS Journal, 2012, Vol 24 No 1
Over the years in the AIMS Journal I have read many appalling accounts of ill-treatment, with Emmy Lomas's account (Vol. 23 No. 2, 2011) one of the most recent. With the exception of a few medical complications, if a mother has not had the sort of birth she wanted, it is the obstetrician who has FAILED to give her that.
Obstetricians have FAILED to prevent distress.
Obstetricians have FAILED to research or evaluate the dangers of their interventions and routine procedures.
AIMS has rightly questioned these procedures overthe years and research, e.g. into ultrasound, is well overdue. (Fortunately, when I had my three children at home – 1980, 1981 and 1984 – scanning was not even mentioned to me and so I did not even have to refuse it.) Also read what Marjorie Tew has to say about obstetricians' cunning dominance in her book Safer Childbirth: a critical history of maternity care.
To turn to lighter things, in the previous Journal (Vol. 23 No. 1, 2011), there was a letter from Wendy Pagler about a TV series' fictional birth. There have also been a few series on television which have had an episode featuring births NOT in a maternity ward:
I was glad to see the ancient right to mine coal in the Forest of Dean for those born in the Hundred of St. Briavels (i.e. they need to be born at home) being mentioned in the series Great Railway Journeys on BBC2 on 18th January. The miner interviewed said they had the highest rate of home births there. Do they?
I found the whole Journal (Vol 23 No 4) inspiring, especially the articles on breech birth at home and twin birth at home. The article on ‘Undisturbed birth' was excellent and thought-provoking and the article re overdue dates great. I arrived 24 days late, at home, of course. My husband was born about two weeks after his due date, but my own three children, born at home in the 1980s, all came before their due dates.
Keep up the good work.
Diana Beamish
Dear AIMS
Have just started to read the journal and wanted to say congratulations to all on what looks to be a brilliant issue.
And well timed in the light of the recent terrible news about what has been going on at Barking, Havering and Redbridge – another huge unit formed by mergers – now reducing its number of births from 10,000 to 9,000...
Here's the link to the Independent article but I'm sure you will have seen the news www.independent.co.uk/lifestyle/health-and-families/health-news/inspectors-findculture-of-abuse-in-nhs-trusts-maternity-services-2376931.html
Sarah
The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..
AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.
To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk
We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.