Birth Activists Briefing: Maternal Mental Health Service Progress Report

ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)

AIMS Journal, 2024, Vol 36, No 4

By the AIMS Campaigns Team


The NHS England Long Term Plan published in 2019 called for the establishment of ‘maternity outreach clinics’, now known as maternal mental health services (MMHS), across the country. This was a welcome initiative, intended to redress the long-standing neglect of perinatal mental health. The aim was for MMHS to support women with moderate to severe mental health conditions directly related to their pregnancy experience, through three “pathways of care” (as quoted in the report):

  • Birth trauma

  • Tokophobia (severe fear of childbirth)

  • Perinatal loss, including miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, medical termination of pregnancy and parent-infant separation at or soon after birth due to safeguarding.

They were also intended to provide training to other healthcare staff and help to facilitate joined up mental health care across the maternity services in their area.

This Maternal Mental Health Services progress report published in October 2024 by the Maternal Mental Health Alliance (MMHA) reveals that, although services have been established in most areas, there is wide variation in the extent and quality of provision. Further, “many of these small services are struggling to cope with levels of demand.” It seems that perinatal mental health remains seriously underfunded and under-resourced.

An interim report ESMI-III: The Effectiveness and Implementation of Maternal Mental Health Services was published by the National Institute for Health and Care Research in 2022 but as the MMHA report notes “this does not include detailed information such as locations, staffing levels, pathways available and common challenges faced by teams.” It is this gap that the MMHA report sought to address. Their research took the form of an online questionnaire to which replies were received from 41 out of a possible 46 services. Worryingly, one service had already closed due to funding issues.

All the services that replied are offering support to women who have experienced perinatal loss, but only 85% are supporting those who have experienced birth trauma and only 80% those suffering tokophobia. Even more troubling, given the vulnerability of this group, is that only 27% (11/41) are supporting women who have lost custody of their babies due to safeguarding concerns.

The MMHA report also notes that “the wide variation between services: what care is provided; what the criteria are to access care; and how long women must wait, suggests there are not enough resources to meet the true needs of the population.” As a result there is a postcode lottery in whether women and birthing people with similar needs qualify for support or receive it in a timely manner. The waiting time for assessment ranged from ‘immediately’ up to six months, and the wait for one-to-one therapy could be up to a year in some areas. The damage being done to the mental health of mothers and families by these lengthy waits, or by being referred and then told they do not qualify for treatment, is appalling to contemplate.

Although most services have funding assured for their current level of provision this does not allow for expansion, despite there being unmet demand. Many are also struggling to recruit and retain the staff they need.

Another concern highlighted in the MMHA report is the failure by a high proportion of MMHS to collect data on which population groups are accessing their services and, in particular, data on those likely to experience greater discrimination. Without this, attempts to improve equity in access to maternal mental health services are likely to fail.

The MMHA make the following recommendations:

  • Commitment to MMHS at national and local level, with ongoing targets and clear expectations of what the MMHS offer should be

  • Expand MMHS to meet levels of need, with a clear timeframe

  • Make MMHS inclusive for all, ensuring that they are “resourced to reach out, become more culturally inclusive and adapt to the unique needs of their diverse local communities.”

  • Collect and publish more data to demonstrate progress and gaps

  • Quality standards for MMHS to deliver “compassionate and equitable treatment.”

  • Education and training across the system with sufficient time allocated for MMHS staff to provide this.

These are all worthy aims, but fundamentally what is needed is a commitment to resource MMHS to meet the needs of all who need it, so that “ALL women, babies and families impacted by perinatal mental health problems have equitable access to high quality, compassionate care and support.”


The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services..

AIMS Journal articles on the website go back to 1960, offering an important historical record of maternity issues over the past 60 years. Please check the date of the article because the situation that it discusses may have changed since it was published. We are also very aware that the language used in many articles may not be the language that AIMS would use today.

To contact the editors, please email: journal@aims.org.uk

We make the AIMS Journal freely available so that as many people as possible can benefit from the articles. If you found this article interesting please consider supporting us by becoming an AIMS member or making a donation. We are a small charity that accepts no commercial sponsorship, in order to preserve our reputation for providing impartial, evidence-based information.

JOIN AIMS

MAKE A DONATION

Buy AIMS a Coffee with Ko-Fi

AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.

Latest Content

Journal

« »

Women, Pregnancy and Artificial Int…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 By Christopher Yau, Nuffield Department for Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford on behalf of the MUM-PREDICT and OPTIMAL…

Read more

What has the AIMS Campaigns Team be…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 What has the AIMS Campaigns Team been up to this quarter? By The AIMS Campaigns Team Published written outputs: 19th August: Peer review…

Read more

Conflicting advice for pregnant wom…

AIMS Journal, 2025, Vol 37, No 4 Researchers Siang Ing Lee and Ngawai Moss report on the qualitative study they conducted to inform a core outcome set for studies of preg…

Read more

Events

« »

AIMS Workshop: Wellbeing

AIMS is delighted to be hosting a Wellbeing workshop delivered by Ruth Weston , veteran birth activist, AIMS member and author of 'Born Stroppy Make Change Happen'. This…

Read more

Threads of Protest: Human Rights in…

It combines the talents and knowledge of members of the public, artists, professional crocheters and charitable organisations to create crochet artwork designed to challe…

Read more

AIMS Workshop: The Foundation Stone…

Join us for one of our series of interactive online AIMS workshops " The Foundation Stones for Supporting the Physiological Process in Pregnancy and Birth ". Please follo…

Read more

Latest Campaigns

« »

AIMS, ARM and Birthrights Open Lett…

AIMS (Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services), ARM (the Association of Radical Midwives) and Birthrights are jointly calling for action in the light of th…

Read more

NICE Intrapartum Care - Water birth…

AIMS submitted comments on the draft NICE Guideline update on Intrapartum care for Water birth: second stage of labour (August 2025). You can read the the draft here You…

Read more

AIMS Responds to NHS 10 Year Workfo…

NHS workforce planning needs to be fit for the maternity service The current system of NHS workforce planning in England is not delivering a safe, personalised and equita…

Read more