To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here
By Journal editors Emma Ashworth and Katie Hickey
'Speed Them Up'
Kindly donated for AIMS' use by Susan Merrick
Can there simultaneously be too much and yet not enough of something? It seems, when it comes to induction, that yes, there can be.
The AIMS Helpline inbox is frequently filled with emails from women who are telling us about the coercion that they are receiving from their doctor or midwife, pressure to be induced with little or no explanation – or, worse, the ‘dead baby card’1. At the same time, we also get vast numbers of emails from women who are not being listened to when they try to tell their health care provider that they are worried about their baby.
With the national induction rate at 32.6% (2017–18) many of us are extremely worried about the recent sharp increase and the potential consequences this has for women and their babies. How have we got to this situation? What are the benefits and risks to having so many induced births in the UK? Do women know they have the power to refuse an induction if it is offered and do they know what questions to ask?
This Journal attempts to make a start at unpicking the good, the bad and the ugly that is induction. We evaluate research, how it is applied in the real world and how it affects women and babies. Katie Hickey has investigated the care bundles that are trying to reduce the numbers of babies who are lost to stillbirth – induction being front and centre of the proposed solutions, with the assumption that babies are ‘better out than in’. Ann Roberts digs into the 35/39 study which has led to women in their late 30s and 40s being strongly encouraged into induction, and Gemma McKenzie reviews some research into women’s experiences of induction. Sadly lacking in so much research, the way that induction affects women and babies must be brought to the centre of any ongoing studies.
We know that women who are induced are often denied access to water, while still being offered heroin (diamorphine) or an epidural with all its associated risks. Dianne Garland and Emma Ashworth share their research into how water can be used during any form of induction to help women to enjoy a better experience, and hopefully to provide support for more movement, reducing the chance of adverse outcomes associated with epidurals where the woman is confined to a bed. And to show that induction can be a wonderful experience for some, we welcome Jay Kelly’s birth story: her favourite birth was an induced birth!
We feel that the article by Debbie Chippington Derrick and Nadia Higson, who have evaluated the data reported by MBBRACE (and previously CMACE) may leave many needing to rethink their assumptions. That the risk of stillbirth for women who have waited for birth beyond 42 weeks appears to be LOWER, not higher, according the MBRRACE data and that from earlier confidential enquiries.
As well as our themed articles we would like to thank our contributors for their invaluable contributions which include articles on supporting visually impaired women around pregnancy and birth, an update on the homebirth situation in York and an account of Beth Whitehead’s search for justice following her assault in birth. As always, if you have an article to offer which hasn’t been published elsewhere, please do get in touch with us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
We hope that you enjoy this edition of the AIMS Journal. The AIMS Journal is supported by AIMS Membership subscriptions and the work of AIMS could not continue without the support of our Members. We would be delighted if you would consider joining AIMS as a Member (www.aims.org.uk/join-us).
1. "Beware the Dead Baby Card" Jo Dagustun. AIMS Journal, 2012, Vol 24 No 3
AIMS supports all maternity service users to navigate the system as it exists, and campaigns for a system which truly meets the needs of all.
The AIMS Journal spearheads discussions about change and development in the maternity services. From the beginning of 2018, the journal has been published online and is freely available to anyone with an interest in pregnancy and birth issues. Membership of AIMS continues to support and fund our ability to create the online journal, as well as supporting our other work, including campaigning and our Helpline. To contact the editors, please email: email@example.com
AIMS Journal, 2021, Vol 33, No 2 To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here By the AIMS Campaigns Team The Campaigns Steering Group…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2021, Vol 33, No 2 To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here Birth in the 21 st Century is a Spanish documentary pro…Read more
AIMS Journal, 2021, Vol 33, No 2 To read or download this Journal in a magazine format on ISSUU, please click here By Jenny Chambers In this article, Jenny introduces us…Read more
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 2020 Making a difference past and future The purpose of the day is to celebrate what Birth Activists in general and AIMS in particular have achieved,…Read more
This year’s AGM will be an online meeting, so we plan to keep it to two hours. However, there will be the opportunity to stay, chat and socialise with friends and colleag…Read more
AIMS has prepared comments on the draft NICE Guideline for Inducing Labour You can read our comments here The details of the consultation on the draft guidelines can be f…Read more
As part of its non-inquiry work, the Health and Social Care Select Committee have established a panel to conduct an evaluation of the Government's commitments in the area…Read more
AIMS and our partners in the But Not Maternity Alliance and National Maternity Voices organised a webinar for MVP/MSLC representatives. The purpose was to raise awareness…Read more