Search the journal articles
Choose a journal by date and volume:
--- Please Choose ---
2025, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Thinking about breastfeeding)
2025, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Women in labour: Do not disturb!)
2025, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Listen with Grandmother)
2024, Vol. 36, No. 4 (The deafness loop: a cycle of inequality)
2024, Vol. 36, No. 3 (A Matter of Trust)
2024, Vol. 36, No. 2 (When the Mother is Unwell)
2024, Vol. 36, No. 1 (I am writing to complain)
2023, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Mixed Feelings)
2023, Vol. 35, No. 3 (We were there)
2023, Vol. 35, No. 2 (Where will the baby come out? Birthplace dreams, instincts and lived experience)
2023, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Dare we say it? Physiological birth)
2022, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Picturing Birth)
2022, Vol. 34, No. 3 (Once Upon a Birth)
2022, Vol. 34, No. 2 (The Sound of Violence)
2022, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Induction: love's labours lost?)
2021, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Birth of a pandemic: How we coped)
2021, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Decision-making and consent)
2021, Vol. 33, No. 2 (A Plurality of Births: Languages, Places, Communities)
2021, Vol. 33, No. 1 (Salutogenesis - Putting the Health Back Into Healthcare)
2020, Vol. 32, No. 4 (The Use of Social Media in Pregnancy and Early Parenthood)
2020, Vol. 32, No. 3 (AIMS at 60 - Making a difference past and future)
2020, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Pandemic birth: Women's own stories during Covid-19)
2020, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Breaking Down the Barriers to VBAC)
2019, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Raging Hormones - The Power of Birth)
2019, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Resolution: Finding Closure Following Birth)
2019, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Everyone's an Individual (I'm not!))
2019, Vol. 31, No. 1 (To Induce or Not To Induce - At Least Ask the Question?)
2019, Vol. 30, No. 4 (When Birth Becomes Trauma)
2018-19, Vol. 30, No. 3 (The Politics of Infant Feeding)
2018, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Implementing Better Births Part 2)
2018, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Implementing Better Births Part 1)
2017, Vol. 29, No. 4 (Twins and Multiples: More Babies, More Decisions, Same Rights)
2017, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Making Decisions)
2017, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Changing Language)
2017, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Focus on what makes a difference)
2016, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Reforming maternity)
2016, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Creating Continuity)
2016, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Back to the Future)
2016, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Caring for Midwives)
2015–16, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Birthplace Matters)
2015–16, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Stillbirth)
2015–16, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Ensuring good births for all)
2015–16, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Human Rights and the maternity jigsaw)
2014–15, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Supporting Birth)
2014–15, Vol. 26, No. 3 (State of the NHS)
2014–15, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Long-term Impact)
2014–15, Vol. 26, No. 1 (What about the evidence?)
2013–14, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Freedom of choice - When women really get to choose)
2013–14, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Breastfeeding and Biology - Supporting access to breastmilk?)
2013–14, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Remembering Women - What happens when women are not part of the decision chain?)
2013–14, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Policing Pregnancy - Who is really in charge?)
2012–13, Vol. 24, No. 4 (Commissioning Care - Building women-centred choice)
2012–13, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Are you asking? considering consent)
2012–13, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Place of Birth - why women don't have a real choice)
2012–13, Vol. 24, No. 1 ('Please treat me normally' Women share their thoughts on care)
2011–12, Vol. 23, No. 4 ('High Risk' When does a label become a self-fulfilling prophecy?)
2011–12, Vol. 23, No. 3 (International Witch Hunt - the campaign against midwifery)
2011–12, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Challenging the medicalisation of birth)
2011–12, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Normality)
2010–11, Vol. 22, No. 4 (Campaigning for 50 years 1960 - 2010)
2010–11, Vol. 22, No. 3 (The persecution of woman centred care)
2010–11, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Caesarean Birth)
2010–11, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Is anyone listening?)
2009–10, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Good Care)
2009–10, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Midwifery under Threat)
2009–10, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Social Services - The secrecy of forced adoption)
2009–10, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Campaigning, Complaining and Caring)
2008–9, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Midwifery Focus - Looking at supporting normal birth)
2008–9, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Home Birth, in search of normality)
2008–9, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Birth in Europe - Is there unity in the EU?)
2008–9, Vol. 20, No. 1 (The Value of Mothering - Are mothers let down when Culture can't care?)
2007–8, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Rhetoric and Reality - How do they compare on the ground?)
2007–8, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Where is the Support? Just how medicalised, institutionalised and fragmented are maternity services? )
2007–8, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Listen with Mother - Considering our options for the future of maternity care )
2007–8, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Birth Trauma - What makes birth traumatic and how can we help? )
2006–7, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Consultation Conundrums)
2006–7, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Free-standing and Proud)
2006–7, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Breastfeeding - Supporting Success)
2006–7, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Homebirth - why is it still hard labour?)
2005–6, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Choice - an abused concept)
2005–6, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Do Women Want Midwives or Obstetric Nurses? The AIMS conference poses the question)
2005–6, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Help us to save our Birthing Units!)
2005–6, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Hands off that breech!)
2004-5, Vol. 16, No. 4 (Why are more mothers dying?)
2004-5, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Health Visitors or Health Police?)
2004-5, Vol. 16, No. 2 (NICE guidelines for caesarean section)
2004-5, Vol. 16, No. 1 (Is it murder to refuse a caesarean?)
2003-4, Vol. 15, No. 4 (The politics of cot death)
2003-4, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Challenging the illusion of choice)
2003-4, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Premature babies: Avoidable deaths)
2003-4, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Shaken baby syndrome: Caused by hospital care)
2002-3, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Failure in expectations: it's all your fault!)
2002-3, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Money running out for convenience caesareans)
2002-3, Vol. 14, No. 2 (State-sanctioned kidnapping: Violation of a baby's human rights)
2002-3, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Caesarean section or vaginal birth - What difference does it make?)
2001-2, Vol. 13, No. 4 (What is normal birth? Time to stop confusing what is common with what is normal)
2001-2, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Misoprostol for induction of labour - Untested, Unapproved and Unnecessary)
2001-2, Vol. 13, No. 2 (What Happens When a Woman Needs a Caesarean?)
2001-2, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Supporting the Mother - Where are the midwife advocates?)
2000-1, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Under-motivated, Under-skilled and Under Threat)
2000-1, Vol. 12, No. 3 (A Nail in the Coffin for Home Birth)
2000-1, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Waterbirth - Time to Move forward)
2000-1, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Responding To Women's Needs)
1999-2000, Vol. 11, No. 4 (The Safety of Hospital Birth - The myth versus the reality)
1999-2000, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Where's the Good News?)
1999-2000, Vol. 11, No. 2 (The Witch Hunt)
1999-2000, Vol. 11, No. 1 (Midwifery - Will Higher Level Equal Lower Skill?)
1998-9, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Miscarriage - The Loss of A Baby)
1998-9, Vol. 10, No. 3 (Breech Presentation)
1998-9, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Active Management of Labour)
1998-9, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Is Labour Just a Pain?)
1997-8, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Maternity Madness)
1997, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Normal Birth - A Movement Standing Still)
1995, Vol. 7, No. 4 (Shackled Women)
1990, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Caesareans ...Something must be wrong)
Browse all journal articles
2025 , Vol. 37, No. 3
2025 , Vol. 37, No. 2
2025 , Vol. 37, No. 1
2024 , Vol. 36, No. 4
2024 , Vol. 36, No. 3
2024 , Vol. 36, No. 2
2024 , Vol. 36, No. 1
2023 , Vol. 35, No. 4
2023 , Vol. 35, No. 3
2023 , Vol. 35, No. 2
2023 , Vol. 35, No. 1
2022 , Vol. 34, No. 4
2022 , Vol. 34, No. 3
2022 , Vol. 34, No. 2
2022 , Vol. 34, No. 1
2021 , Vol. 33, No. 4
2021 , Vol. 33, No. 3
2021 , Vol. 33, No. 2
2021 , Vol. 33, No. 1
2020 , Vol. 32, No. 4
2020 , Vol. 32, No. 3
2020 , Vol. 32, No. 2
2020 , Vol. 32, No. 1
2019 , Vol. 31, No. 4
2019 , Vol. 31, No. 3
2019 , Vol. 31, No. 2
2019 , Vol. 31, No. 1
2019 , Vol. 30, No. 4
2018-19 , Vol. 30, No. 3
2018 , Vol. 30, No. 2
2018 , Vol. 30, No. 1
2017 , Vol. 29, No. 4
2017 , Vol. 29, No. 3
2017 , Vol. 29, No. 2
2017 , Vol. 29, No. 1
2016 , Vol. 28, No. 4
2016 , Vol. 28, No. 3
2016 , Vol. 28, No. 2
2016 , Vol. 28, No. 1
2015–16 , Vol. 27, No. 4
2015–16 , Vol. 27, No. 3
2015–16 , Vol. 27, No. 2
2015–16 , Vol. 27, No. 1
2014–15 , Vol. 26, No. 4
2014–15 , Vol. 26, No. 3
2014–15 , Vol. 26, No. 2
2014–15 , Vol. 26, No. 1
2013–14 , Vol. 25, No. 4
2013–14 , Vol. 25, No. 3
2013–14 , Vol. 25, No. 2
2013–14 , Vol. 25, No. 1
2012–13 , Vol. 24, No. 4
2012–13 , Vol. 24, No. 3
2012–13 , Vol. 24, No. 2
2012–13 , Vol. 24, No. 1
2011–12 , Vol. 23, No. 4
2011–12 , Vol. 23, No. 3
2011–12 , Vol. 23, No. 2
2011–12 , Vol. 23, No. 1
2010–11 , Vol. 22, No. 4
2010–11 , Vol. 22, No. 3
2010–11 , Vol. 22, No. 2
2010–11 , Vol. 22, No. 1
2009–10 , Vol. 21, No. 4
2009–10 , Vol. 21, No. 3
2009–10 , Vol. 21, No. 2
2009–10 , Vol. 21, No. 1
2008–9 , Vol. 20, No. 4
2008–9 , Vol. 20, No. 3
2008–9 , Vol. 20, No. 2
2008–9 , Vol. 20, No. 1
2007–8 , Vol. 19, No. 4
2007–8 , Vol. 19, No. 3
2007–8 , Vol. 19, No. 2
2007–8 , Vol. 19, No. 1
2006–7 , Vol. 18, No. 4
2006–7 , Vol. 18, No. 3
2006–7 , Vol. 18, No. 2
2006–7 , Vol. 18, No. 1
2005–6 , Vol. 17, No. 4
2005–6 , Vol. 17, No. 3
2005–6 , Vol. 17, No. 2
2005–6 , Vol. 17, No. 1
2004-5 , Vol. 16, No. 4
2004-5 , Vol. 16, No. 3
2004-5 , Vol. 16, No. 2
2004-5 , Vol. 16, No. 1
2003-4 , Vol. 15, No. 4
2003-4 , Vol. 15, No. 3
2003-4 , Vol. 15, No. 2
2003-4 , Vol. 15, No. 1
2002-3 , Vol. 14, No. 4
2002-3 , Vol. 14, No. 3
2002-3 , Vol. 14, No. 2
2002-3 , Vol. 14, No. 1
2001-2 , Vol. 13, No. 4
2001-2 , Vol. 13, No. 3
2001-2 , Vol. 13, No. 2
2001-2 , Vol. 13, No. 1
2000-1 , Vol. 12, No. 4
2000-1 , Vol. 12, No. 3
2000-1 , Vol. 12, No. 2
2000-1 , Vol. 12, No. 1
1999-2000 , Vol. 11, No. 4
1999-2000 , Vol. 11, No. 3
1999-2000 , Vol. 11, No. 2
1999-2000 , Vol. 11, No. 1
1998-9 , Vol. 10, No. 4
1998-9 , Vol. 10, No. 3
1998-9 , Vol. 10, No. 2
1998-9 , Vol. 10, No. 1
1997-8 , Vol. 9, No. 3
1997 , Vol. 9, No. 2
1995 , Vol. 7, No. 4
1990 , Vol. 2, No. 2
Journal Vol. 36, No. 3 — A Matter of Trust
ISSN 2516-5852 (Online)
Editorial - Trust and responsibility: Going with the flow Alex Smith considers the relationship between uncertainty, trust and responsibility, proposing the practice of truly consensual care as a form of birth activism - for parents and professionals alike.
Trust in maternity care – Going, going, gone? Mary Nolan explores the issue of trust within maternity care and shares her very deep concerns about the relationship between mothers and midwives.
Trusting myself in birth Salli Ward recalls a time when everyone knew and trusted the village midwife, and wonders if a time will come when we see a complete loss of trust in women’s bodies to give birth to their babies?
An invitation to contemplate the meaning of trust Bernadett Kasza asks, If women are not supposed to trust their bodies, who can they trust?
Exploring trust within the midwife-mother relationship Dr. Marie Lewis reflects on the journey of trust within the midwife-mother relationship, highlighting its significance in modern maternity services and advocating for its continued cultivation and prioritisation.
An interview with Dr Malika M. Bonapace, D.Psy Alex Smith interviews Dr Malika M. Bonapace about her work with health professionals and her mission to teach the world to trust in birth.
I trust we can change Claire Dunn walked out of her first placement as a student nurse when she witnessed the shocking lack of care afforded to women in labour, but still holds out hope that things can change.
A review of: European Association of Perinatal Medicine (EAPM), European Board and College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (EBCOG), European Midwives Association (EMA). Joint position statement: Substandard and disrespectful care in labour – because words matter Gemma McKenzie challenges yet another attempt by health care practitioners to silence women and their use of the term ‘obstetric violence’.
Getting on my soapbox on the theme of trust: what’s in a name, and do you trust your local NHS Trust? Jo Dagustun reflects on whether the word ‘trust’ in relation to ‘NHS trusts’ is simply a way to seduce us into believing exactly what they want us to believe about their organisation.
Revisiting pregnancy and birth through an autistic lens Sarah Fisher looks back on her journeys to motherhood with new autistic insight, reflecting on the importance of having trust in herself and her care providers.
We always have a choice, no matter how much we are made to feel otherwise. Rachel Wolfe bitterly regrets her unquestioning obedience of the midwives and doctors when she gave birth to her first baby. In this article she explains why she wished she had trusted herself.
Black Trust Within Maternity Mars Lord gives an impassioned account of the disparities for Black bodied women in maternity care.
The physiology of Trust Kath Revell explores the physiology of trust in relation to the physiology of birth.
Two poems Two poems about trust.
Get out there and conference! Jo Dagustun is on a mission to see lay people become ever more effective advocates for improvement by attending birth conferences.
Issues of trust led to me becoming a volunteer for AIMS Ryan Jones' stalwart trust in the medical profession was betrayed again and again throughout his wife’s pregnancy and birth. It was an experience that led him to volunteer for AIMS.
Why be an AIMS member? On behalf of the AIMS Management Team, Nadia Higson explains why you might consider becoming an AIMS member.
AIMS is concerned about the accessibility of CQC local maternity service ratings: should you be too? AIMS calls on all birth activists to help their local community - and improve national practice - by investigating the accessibility of the Care Quality Commission (CQC)’s rating for your local maternity services.
Continuity Matters - Women’s Voices As the new model of midwifery care rolls out in Northern Ireland, one mother describes how it benefitted her.
AIMS Physiology-Informed Maternity Services (PIMS) - September 2024
What has the AIMS Campaigns Team been up to this quarter? The AIMS Campaigns team updates us about their recent activities.
When the Mother is Unwell
The deafness loop: a cycle of inequality
